| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (16)

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 7:33PM Mika101 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The game is a lot of fun but the lack of online multiplayer ruins it.

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 7:36PM Gaddes said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
That video did not make me want to play the game at all.

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 7:40PM HardBoiled2009 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
it seems interesting but i lost on the tutorial .. just so much stuff i have to watch for .. i was laying blocks then my guy got beat up badly then BAM it was over and i was like oh damn .. oh well .. i know this is gonna make me mad and cause too much is stuff going on i passed up on it.

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 8:55PM Urethra Alfredo said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@HardBoiled2009

Yeah, the demo was like studying for the LSAT while skipping rope and making a grilled cheese sandwich. It's just too much.

I applaud any developer that tries something new, but this...this just doesn't work.
Reply

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 8:19PM Shinta said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The soundtrack sounds pretty killer from that video.

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 9:38PM MasterYogurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Maybe this is nitpicky but if you don't have much local multiplayer opportunity why were you picked to do the review? That seems critical to this game, and it's hard to rate it as mediocre when you weren't playing it to its fullest.

I know that you say that the strategy seems shallow, but perhaps if you had put more time into the multi it would have started to crystallize. Or perhaps it would have been more shallowness.

I guess I'm just saying that it doesn't seem like a wholly fair review if a game that screams "Made for Local Multi" is tested extensively in a different way. That's like testing a flight simulator without control sticks, or playing Call of Duty's singleplayer and reviewing it based on that.

It's easy to decide for ourselves to get a game or not if it lacks online multi. We rely on you guys to tell us if it's any good - and your review just was inadequate in that regard.

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 9:40PM MasterYogurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ok I just watched the video and I honestly think that was the worst sales attempt ever made.

Wow. What WAS that? If the game's about four things at once I don't even know what ONE of them is!
Reply

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 10:34PM Gooblechev said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MasterYogurt Yea, I don't even know what the video was.

I looked like this: O_o
Reply

Posted: Apr 5th 2011 1:10PM alec from fire hose said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Gooblechev

Hey guys, just wanted to point you to our release trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw4HgE8Z590

And here's a video I made explaining the mechanics in the game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hYKy98tWPY

The video here was part of a contest where people could vote on the names for different characters. This was a video meant to introduce the character that was ultimately named Zephyr - it doesn't really fit into the context of this review.

Hope these videos give you a better sense of what our game is about.
Reply

Posted: Apr 6th 2011 9:59PM MasterYogurt said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@alec from fire hose

Thanks for posting that - now I actually get what the game's about! It doesn't seem like my bag at all. One on one I might be able to get but I think there are too many systems in play for four-player - chaotic action means being able to quickly determine strategy. Like, Chu Chu Rocket is wild in 4 player but it's easy to see your options and what might help you strategically. Here... very confusing.

Still, that's my personal opinion, and I haven't played it. But it seems like a more fair one than this review, which barely even tried the multiplayer. The fact that Joystiq posted an unrelated video only made this review worse.

If you're going to review a game, have some integrity and play. Don't say "I didn't have friends so I couldn't review the PART EVERYONE CARES ABOUT." That's a cop-out. That's like giving an MMO a low score because your internet was out for a weekend. Take a few evenings, offer a few friends some beer, pay some people, I don't know.

Reviews like this tarnish the site's reputation.
Reply

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 10:58PM db2 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Over-hyped game met with lukewarm reception. Film at 11:00.

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 11:12PM 01 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What the hell?

Posted: Apr 4th 2011 11:55PM wcarnation said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seems to me most people that can't get into this game or get over the initial learning stages are not people who typically play any sort of strategy game.

And probably why 90% of games today are FPS.

Posted: Apr 5th 2011 12:04AM FriedConsole said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@wcarnation

I actually took time to learn the game and just found it too frantic. It was hard to even come up with strategies because there is too much going on at once and it is hard to tell what is going on sometimes. They should have gotten rid of one of the games in the mash up. If they ditched the brawler fighting (the weakest component), it probably would have been better.
Reply

Posted: Apr 5th 2011 3:39AM Kirkpad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Meh, as a person who likes variety in their games, this was a 4/5 for me.

Posted: Apr 5th 2011 9:26AM Typhonic said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think I'll pick this up.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW