| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (148)

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:34PM SpaceFox said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
For the Wii 2 perhaps?

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:43PM Revengez said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@SpaceFox Yes, that makes perfect sense. Let's delay a game so we can release it for the Wii 2 even though the Wii 2 won't be out in Q1! Obviously, if they wanted to port it to the wii 2 they'd release ME3 first and then work on the port afterwards like what they did for ME2 and PS3.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:02PM Lambrick said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Revengez aaactually, i think they're on to something if they're shotting to release on the wii2 before the wii2 release. that's a LOT of untapped market, which is what they're after. right?

...

right?
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 10:16PM eviladrian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpaceFox Heh, looks like most folks didn't know you were joking!
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 11:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Lambrick It's more about avoiding the Skyrim and Diablo 3 releases.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 11:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Bioware already stated that there will be no multiplayer in Mass Effect 3.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/106157-UPDATE-BioWare-Denies-Multiplayer-for-Mass-Effect-3
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 12:53AM Liquidfingers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

are you suuuure?! it is EA, and i thought i read somewhere that they actually did confirm it would have multiplayer. here's hoping that it doesn't, because really, that wouldn't even make sense.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 2:48AM Torticoli said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheFirstLegionnaire Indeed. I'm so very disappointed.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 5:35AM Fullmetal Salchemist said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@TheFirstLegionnaire

They're just trying to make it more accessible to the PopCap games demographic. For example, RPG elements are too complex and scary, so they were removed almost entirely for part 2. Presumably, for part 3, they'll remove the ability to make story-based decisions.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 8:54AM Vegeta has a ps3 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheFirstLegionnaire

Yeah...because of a rumored multiplayer component, EA has totally ruined this game.

Glad to know our resident, fortune teller is still here, or might have wasted money on crap.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 9:10AM Playace said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpaceFox

Hey I liked your idea. I'd buy it on the Wii 2.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 1:07PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Liquidfingers EA is smart enough to know that starting a multiplayer component with this little time left is an awful idea. If they ever intended to have it, they would have had it from the start. Beginning to make it now is an idea so dumb only internet commentators could come up with it.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:35PM Ballistic H said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"larger market opportunity"... for casual players...

:(

Posted: May 4th 2011 10:31PM Cap Morgan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ballistic H

I love Bioware, but honestly I'm wishing for a "say it ain't so" moment here

I read that statement and that is exactly what I read here. Either casual game play or multiplayer PVP cause market research shows that games with PvP have a higher buy rate.

The only way this could possibly be good is if someone was listening to the fact that people actually liked watching someone play ME2. It was entertaining to play and to watch. It was a RPG, it was a shooter and it was an interactive experience. The characters believable and likeable.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to fantasy land where they're not making a PvP shooter and recording Mordin's top 40 songs.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 1:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Cap Morgan - Multiplayer could be okay, it is the Unreal 3 engine after all. My fear is that the "RPG" elements (what few of them are left from ME1) are all going to get cut. That would be a worst case scenario.

I know that things get pushed to Q1 of the next year, every single year, but this year is cutting me deep. First my number one most anticipated game (The Last Guardian) and now my number two most anticipated game (ME3). I have a feeling that Batman won't make it this year either, and that Q4 will consist of me playing Skyrim for months and....

Okay, crisis averted.
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 8:56AM Daverator said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ballistic H

I am hoping that they are just saying this because they don't actually want to say "We think that holiday 11 is too crowded" Because while ME2 did take some steps in the right direction. Such as having all guns being manageable from level 1. (your guy is a trained soldier, he should fire whatever he is holding in the right general direction). It did so by stripping out far too many rpg elements.

When the only way to find more than one upgrade for your weapon is to buy DLC then you are doing it wrong.
Reply

Posted: May 6th 2011 1:46AM king kagi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well then, damn. But I am now having a good summer.

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:37PM TheRedComet said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
EA is playing it safe with this one- the nerdrage over DA2 did NOT go unnoticed.

Posted: May 4th 2011 8:00PM Mazrael said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@TheRedComet
They'll get a bigger nerdrage if they add multiplayer.. especially competive multiplayer
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 9:31PM Nuisance said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheFirstLegionnaire Going by my experience in the demo and a few comments threads, I'd imagine the number of people anxiously waiting for the PC version of Dragon Age 3 is rather smaller than those who waited for Dragon Age 2.

Changing the camera did not go over well.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 11:39PM possdoom said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mazrael well they came from somewhere if not a planet then a giant space station similar to the one at the end of ME2 only on a much bigger scale
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:39PM king kagi said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Well then, damn. Looks like I will get Skyrim in the fall. But now I have to wait until this comes out.

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:14PM Misfit Toy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@king kagi

Yeah, I bet Bethesda is celebrating this day.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:39PM Andrew12h said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Maybe an option where we can CHOOSE which type of gameplay we want?

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:43PM houser said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Andrew12h But dontcha know? Mass Effect 2's response was overwhelmingly positive, so more in that direction, you'll have 4 guns total and the mods will all work to end up at a Shotgun +12.

Though if the action set pieces aren't so horrifically telegraphed with waist high cover randomly popping up I suppose that'll be palatable. And without the need of a sequel we won't be railroaded as much.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:57PM Dark Archon PSN Archonik XBL Dar said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@houser Let me guess. You weren't a fan of ME2?
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:03PM DokiDokiBawanga said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Dark Archon PSN Archonik XBL Dar i played through ME2 3 times and yes i agree with him i want less shooter and more much more RPG. i want shit load of skills i want my speech skill back! i want loot and upgrades. ME2 i great but combat just don't do it for me.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:13PM houser said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Dark Archon PSN Archonik XBL Dar

Actually loved it. The universe was deep, characters engaging, it remains to be seen if my choices actually matter (the illusion of which was heavy in ME1 and 2, but so far in execution it's meant a few lines of dialogue difference, and a couple characters different).

But while changes were absolutely needed from ME1 to ME2, I think they threw out the baby with the bathwater, and I'll take them at their word that it was due to time and money. But yeah if the DIRECTION to ME2 was the way to go, then a reduction in weapons, in capacity to alter them, and more fighting than exploring are the rules of the day.

I have master hackers on the payroll capable of mucking up alien (even for a sci-fi universe) tech, ancient unknowable shit, and I can't open a side door to avoid that dug in group of mercs, why?

But yeah don't get me wrong, I loved it, but yeah it could have been better.

Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:24PM oJMan240o said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@houser I agree, though it does seem like they are straddling the line a little more, keeping their current formula, but mixing in a little more RPG to bring back some of the RPG fans that were turned off by the lack of those features in ME2. I also think they learned a lot from DA2's reception. How far they can push the simplification before it turns people off.

I trust the team that works on Mass Effect though, much more than the one that works on DA. They do good work.

And all the people at BioWare create great characters and that's more than enough reason to play a BioWare game.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:26PM Epoque said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@DokiDokiBawanga We can have our cake and eat it too though, why doesn't Bioware get this?!

Keep the great shooter mechanics, and keep the great RPG customization. Win/Win! I really enjoyed ME2, and I'm sure ME3 will be a good game, but I LOVED the original Mass Effect. We can have the best of both games, without sacrificing a thing.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 8:37PM houser said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Epoque Yeah that's my big problem with the "overwhelmingly positive response". More fans got on board with ME2. OK it's a good formula, as a first attempt this gen ME1 is definitely rough, but one doesn't have to exclude the other.

Meaning just because ME's inventory was cludgy doesn't mean throwing it out was the only way going forward. Just cause ME2 was good without it also doesn't mean adding it wouldn't have made it better. For me, the mods in ME2 were basically a line of powerups rather than any type of customization. It MIGHT have worked out that way in a meta game sense if there was literally not enough mineral, so you had to choose what to upgrade, but as it was there was literally no thought (and whole lot of tedium in mining, for those that whined about ME1's inventory) in modding weapons.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 9:04PM ipsum said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@houser

But yeah
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 9:54AM ytilanigiroon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@houser
I wouldn't be surprised if conversations were boiled down to Paragon or Renegade options. You go talk to an NPC and a QTE pops up like it does in any significant conversation and you must pull either the left or right trigger. Whichever one you pull decides how the entire conversation goes; you get no more choice after that.

I don't want that, but I could see EA telling BioWare to not make players think about consequences or think about what they're saying before they say it. Just a simple Face or Heel choice. Kinda lame.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:39PM Frostblade10 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Watch them integrate Facebook into it. -_-

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:22PM Air King said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Frostblade10
Welcome to Reaperville, where you'll spend time harvesting humans and growing baby Reapers
Reply

Posted: May 5th 2011 12:55AM ShadowXIII said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Air King

A sad Quarian just wandered in on your farm? Will you give it a home?
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:40PM hyamzy said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Despite delays usually being good when they spend the time working on something crucial, it sounds like this is only going make the game worse. I can already see this turning into a Gears of War clone.

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:41PM Cutty17 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:41PM BULLETBOI said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
i must say, even if ME3 came out this fall, i would still buy it over Skyrim and Uncharted 3. But Bioware was smart delay it for financial reasons ofcourse.

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:41PM Hoops said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
I don't see how this news is good for gamers. There was already plenty of Halo in my Mass Effect.

Posted: May 4th 2011 8:17PM A Sandwich said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Hoops

To be fair, we don't actually know what the news is yet.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 10:15PM Cap Morgan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Hoops
"You got your Mass Effect in my Halo"

"I'm officer Reese's. What seems to be the trouble here?"
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:42PM ailurus74 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
If this IS for multiplayer, I sincerely hope it's co-op. Otherwise, meh.

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:42PM The Cole Train said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Please don't make it Gears of War with a conversation system.

Posted: May 4th 2011 10:37PM Cap Morgan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@The Cole Train

Dom, You don't want to kill your wife!
a) Yeah you're right
b) But it's not her!
c) F*ck this B!tch
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:42PM GrayHero said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Oh dear god, please don't add multiplayer....

Posted: May 4th 2011 7:36PM The Wicker Man said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Don't jump down his throat over it! Your roid rage aside, what a bizarre evolution we have seen this game experience.
Reply

Posted: May 4th 2011 6:43PM Design by Adrian said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they add multiplayer, I hope they didn't steal any good devs from the single-player dev team...

Posted: May 4th 2011 9:37PM killer rin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Design by Adrian
Please, they more than likely steal the Devs from another part of their studio that actually has Multiplayer experience. Would you really want Single player Devs with no Multiplayer experience working on Multiplayer?

... They would most likely outsource it out to that team of theirs working on that MMO

Reply

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW