On the eve of its quarterly presentation to investors and analysts, Square Enix today sent out a "revised" (uh-oh) forecast for the financial results of the last fiscal year, which ended March 31, 2011. Stakeholders should bring their ponchos -- they're in for stormy weather.
In February, with nine months in the books, the publisher was confident it could hold onto its threadbare profits, forecasting a meager ¥1 billion ($12 million and change) in net income at the close of the fiscal year. While the unforeseen and devastating Great East Japan Earthquake in March knocked out more than half of that forecast income -- costing Square Enix roughly ¥0.6 billion in amusement facility closures and repairs -- other factors contributed more significantly to the company's now bleak outlook.
So how bad is it? Square Enix currently anticipates a ¥12 billion (nearly $150 million) net loss for the 12-month period, a negative 226 percent change from the previous fiscal year (which brought in ¥9.509 billion in income). Further, accounting for additional subtractions from the balance sheet, the company is bracing investors for "total extraordinary losses of approximately ¥16.0 billion during the fiscal year."
If there's a silver lining, it's in the publisher "introducing a tightened selection standard regarding title lineup" -- which cost Square Enix about ¥4.5 billion in the short term due to project cancellations, including a Highlander game and Gun Loco. But, ideally, this quality control will "strengthen" the company's critical video game segment in the long run, and perhaps restore Square Enix to its former glory.
Reader Comments (169)
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:03PM (Unverified) said
Maybe they should think about doing a remake of a certain game.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:12PM Punkrawk Bbob said
@(Unverified)
A certain game that remains overlooked at the head of this article..?
Square Enix - Thanks me later. Just remake FF6 and FF7 and enjoy the profits. That is all you need to do.
Reply
A certain game that remains overlooked at the head of this article..?
Square Enix - Thanks me later. Just remake FF6 and FF7 and enjoy the profits. That is all you need to do.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:12PM SynthOno said
@(Unverified) Given the recent SE titles I've played, I'm not sure I want it anymore. They've disappeared so far up their own behind I can't help but think they'd ruin it with FMV that ignores all physics and logic (like Advent Children) and stupid whiny idiots who quote bad poetry (Crisis Core).
Reply
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:21PM Once known as Shadsy said
@SynthOno You say that like FF7 didn't already have those.
Reply
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:31PM Punkrawk Bbob said
@Once known as Shadsy
'There ain't no gettin' off this train we're on!!!'
Reply
'There ain't no gettin' off this train we're on!!!'
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:50PM aughscreennames said
Theyll need to start by firing the idiot that said a FF7 remake would take 12 or some odd years to make. That dumbass is a disgrace and is likely the one preventing Square from making real games anymore. I dont think a FF7 remake is detrimental to Squares success but 12 years... god what an idiot. They need to be making games LIKE ff7 again, but with some shit for brains head saying a good rpg takes 12 years to make they are doomed.
They fully deserve this, they have become a terrible company full of highly incompetent people. I dont think Square will ever change until theres a shakeup of the executive staff.
Reply
They fully deserve this, they have become a terrible company full of highly incompetent people. I dont think Square will ever change until theres a shakeup of the executive staff.
Posted: May 12th 2011 1:09PM AxelSteelBMX said
@SynthOno Physics? Logic? What are you going on about? They just leveled up a lot in between FFVII and AC. And equipped about 50 "Motorcycle Acrobatics" Materia apiece.
Reply
Posted: May 12th 2011 2:11PM ShadowXIII said
@(Unverified)
One day I guess, until then....:
http://metrocitizen.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/red-xiii-cait-sith.png?w=420&h=361
Sigh.
Reply
One day I guess, until then....:
http://metrocitizen.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/red-xiii-cait-sith.png?w=420&h=361
Sigh.
Posted: May 12th 2011 7:27PM phinn said
@(Unverified) hah yea exactly. I mean these losses are no surprise, FF-XIII was a let down for many, and FF-XIV is a joke being that it's still free.
They need to get back on track and make a couple of epic RPGs with classic turn based depth and nonlinear fun like FF-VII. Then make a big seller like Kingdom Hearts for PS3/360.
Reply
They need to get back on track and make a couple of epic RPGs with classic turn based depth and nonlinear fun like FF-VII. Then make a big seller like Kingdom Hearts for PS3/360.
Posted: May 12th 2011 11:08PM alexx675 said
@(Unverified)
yes agreed that certain game needs to be freaking FF7 i would def run out and buy it day one if they were to remake it but alas i have a feeling it will never happen since they are to busy making a sequel to a crappy game and not releasing FF13 versus which actually looks promising
Reply
yes agreed that certain game needs to be freaking FF7 i would def run out and buy it day one if they were to remake it but alas i have a feeling it will never happen since they are to busy making a sequel to a crappy game and not releasing FF13 versus which actually looks promising
Posted: May 13th 2011 12:41AM This Little Man Says His Name Is said
@phinn
What depth? Push a on a menu and let the game fight for you?
Epic depth right there.
Reply
What depth? Push a on a menu and let the game fight for you?
Epic depth right there.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:05PM shabby329 said
if they made a remake of that game in the picture i think the caption would read differently...
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:05PM Fillem said
Release FFVII HD and watch the money pour in.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:05PM Doomedlion said
That's what they get for not makeing quality games in years. Just realeasing a game with your name on it doesn't make it good like there PS1 days.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:05PM Frozen Radiator said
You mean Final Fantasy XIV did not perform?
Even after they ignored all of the beta tester's complaints?
I knew it the moment they had us all torrent sharing the install files off each other because the servers could not handle more than 1 download at a time.
Even after they ignored all of the beta tester's complaints?
I knew it the moment they had us all torrent sharing the install files off each other because the servers could not handle more than 1 download at a time.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:13PM Punkrawk Bbob said
@Frozen Radiator
Warcraft uses torrent sharing too though...
Reply
Warcraft uses torrent sharing too though...
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:25PM koehler83 said
@Frozen Radiator Torrenting update files prevents the bottleneck congestion caused when a new update goes live.
This issue has greatly affected FFXI pretty much since it began. Every time a new update goes live, it trickles out to a few hundred players at a time due to server constraints, leaving the majority of players out of luck for usually a day or two.
Torrenting allows those first few hundred to disseminate the files to everyone without having to connect directly to the server. It's simply better logistically. And it keeps raging addict players from killing people.
Reply
This issue has greatly affected FFXI pretty much since it began. Every time a new update goes live, it trickles out to a few hundred players at a time due to server constraints, leaving the majority of players out of luck for usually a day or two.
Torrenting allows those first few hundred to disseminate the files to everyone without having to connect directly to the server. It's simply better logistically. And it keeps raging addict players from killing people.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:50PM Frozen Radiator said
@Punkrawk Bbob
Not the same torrent sharing. I mean the users were forced to create their own torrent and spread it across the forums. This was not something that Square Enix had initially implemented.
Reply
Not the same torrent sharing. I mean the users were forced to create their own torrent and spread it across the forums. This was not something that Square Enix had initially implemented.
Posted: May 13th 2011 10:01AM This Little Man Says His Name Is said
@koehler83
I'd much rather not sit there watching the download do 20kb/s while I know in the background it's probably uploading at 1mb/s.
Reply
I'd much rather not sit there watching the download do 20kb/s while I know in the background it's probably uploading at 1mb/s.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:07PM Acosta02 said
This bodes so well for TWEWY II that I can hardly stand it.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:07PM Urethra Alfredo said
Damn.
Maybe it's time for Square to start making all those games that millions upon millions of fans have been asking for, yet never receive.
Like a sequel to Chrono Trigger.
Or a Final Fantasy VII remake.
Or anything that isn't Final Fantasy XIII-2.
Maybe it's time for Square to start making all those games that millions upon millions of fans have been asking for, yet never receive.
Like a sequel to Chrono Trigger.
Or a Final Fantasy VII remake.
Or anything that isn't Final Fantasy XIII-2.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:27PM Punkrawk Bbob said
@Urethra Alfredo
'Like a sequel to Chrono Trigger.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrono_Cross - 2000 says hello.
Reply
'Like a sequel to Chrono Trigger.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrono_Cross - 2000 says hello.
Posted: May 12th 2011 1:03PM Urethra Alfredo said
@Punkrawk Bbob
I love Chrono Cross.
Though I would've preferred that they had named it "Radical Dreamers" instead of insinuating that it had more than the most tenuous of connections to Chrono Trigger. I, for one, don't consider it to be a sequel to Chrono Trigger.
Which is what I was initially talking about.
A proper sequel.
A child's poorly-drawn picture of Lucca's face does not a sequel make.
http://www.unseen64.net/wp-content/gallery/chrono-cross/picture_lucca_demo.png
Reply
I love Chrono Cross.
Though I would've preferred that they had named it "Radical Dreamers" instead of insinuating that it had more than the most tenuous of connections to Chrono Trigger. I, for one, don't consider it to be a sequel to Chrono Trigger.
Which is what I was initially talking about.
A proper sequel.
A child's poorly-drawn picture of Lucca's face does not a sequel make.
http://www.unseen64.net/wp-content/gallery/chrono-cross/picture_lucca_demo.png
Posted: May 12th 2011 1:05PM TheShaper said
@Urethra Alfredo
I don't get why people are so stubborn about it. Chrono Cross wouldn't even make sense weren't it for Chrono Trigger. And they've tied up both games pretty tight with the PS1 remake ending cutscene.
Seriously man, it's been 11 years, get over it.
Reply
I don't get why people are so stubborn about it. Chrono Cross wouldn't even make sense weren't it for Chrono Trigger. And they've tied up both games pretty tight with the PS1 remake ending cutscene.
Seriously man, it's been 11 years, get over it.
Posted: May 12th 2011 1:17PM DokiDokiBawanga said
@Urethra Alfredo well i'm actually really looking forward XIII-2 really liked XIII and i hated VII so as far as i'm concerned i do not wish to replay VII any more like ever.
Reply
Posted: May 12th 2011 1:19PM Punkrawk Bbob said
@Urethra Alfredo
"I, for one, don't consider it to be a sequel to Chrono Trigger."
You would be wrong - I can consider my monitor a magical device for viewing real existing worlds, a portal into another reality. Or I can consider Taco Bell gourmet food. Facts are facts though. My monitor is simply a display, TB is bottom rung (but occasionaly tasty) fast food.
Chrono Cross is a very proper sequel to Chrono Trigger in every respect. It carried the original design crew, it followed the same concepts, and they even released it as 'THE SEQUEL TO CHRONO TRIGGER'. If you mean a story with the same characters jumping through time some more, go grab a season of quantum leap or sliders. You'll realize it gets old fast. Why not just replay it if that's what you're looking for, or write a fanfic of it? Since the original design team has left, all that would get made is a fanfic under the guise of the original publisher.
Anyways, Chrono Cross was an awesome sequel. I prefer it to CT, but I also played CT for the first time really in 2010. I skipped it on SNES because at the time I couldn't get into it the way my friends did.
Reply
"I, for one, don't consider it to be a sequel to Chrono Trigger."
You would be wrong - I can consider my monitor a magical device for viewing real existing worlds, a portal into another reality. Or I can consider Taco Bell gourmet food. Facts are facts though. My monitor is simply a display, TB is bottom rung (but occasionaly tasty) fast food.
Chrono Cross is a very proper sequel to Chrono Trigger in every respect. It carried the original design crew, it followed the same concepts, and they even released it as 'THE SEQUEL TO CHRONO TRIGGER'. If you mean a story with the same characters jumping through time some more, go grab a season of quantum leap or sliders. You'll realize it gets old fast. Why not just replay it if that's what you're looking for, or write a fanfic of it? Since the original design team has left, all that would get made is a fanfic under the guise of the original publisher.
Anyways, Chrono Cross was an awesome sequel. I prefer it to CT, but I also played CT for the first time really in 2010. I skipped it on SNES because at the time I couldn't get into it the way my friends did.
Posted: May 12th 2011 1:46PM Tab said
@TheShaper
I thought it was a brilliant sequel. So many sequels fall in to the typical sequelitis trap of doing everything exactly the same... BUT 2!! Chrono Cross was brave enough to shake up the formula and I think it did an excellent job doing so. Maybe it was the visual style that people didn't like so perhaps if it looked and played exactly like Trigger people would accept it more?
Reply
I thought it was a brilliant sequel. So many sequels fall in to the typical sequelitis trap of doing everything exactly the same... BUT 2!! Chrono Cross was brave enough to shake up the formula and I think it did an excellent job doing so. Maybe it was the visual style that people didn't like so perhaps if it looked and played exactly like Trigger people would accept it more?
Posted: May 12th 2011 2:30PM Dance Mofo said
@Urethra Alfredo I loved going against Lavos in both Chrono games. He does tie-into both, doesn't he? Lavos did play the key role in Chrono Trigger and Chrono Cross, right? It's been awhile since i played both so.
Reply
Posted: May 12th 2011 2:32PM Urethra Alfredo said
@Punkrawk Bbob
Jesus tapdancing Christ, people, what of "I love Chrono Cross" didn't you understand?
It's my favorite PSOne RPG, hands down. I just thought it was marketed incorrectly.
"Chrono Cross is a very proper sequel to Chrono Trigger in every respect. It carried the original design crew, it followed the same concepts, and they even released it as 'THE SEQUEL TO CHRONO TRIGGER'.
No. If Christopher Nolan and all the cast and crew of The Dark Knight turned around and made a movie about the life and times of a 1930's Vaudeville comedian, that would not be a sequel to The Dark Knight.
Even if they advertised it as "THE SEQUEL TO THE DARK KNIGHT.
It would simply be an unrelated game by the people who brought you The Dark Knight.
As for Chrono Cross "following the same concepts," time-travel and inter-dimensional travel are not one and the same. Sure, both are theoretical and highly unlikely, but so is Heidi Montag's ability to spell her own name.
Again, for the people in the back of the room, I am a huge fan of Chrono Cross. I've been waiting impatiently for it to be released on PSN.
All I'm saying is that there was a reason why the interactive novel Radical Dreamers (which Chrono Cross was an extrapolation of) was not called Chrono "Something."
Everybody needs to calm the f*ck down and put the guns away.
Reply
Jesus tapdancing Christ, people, what of "I love Chrono Cross" didn't you understand?
It's my favorite PSOne RPG, hands down. I just thought it was marketed incorrectly.
"Chrono Cross is a very proper sequel to Chrono Trigger in every respect. It carried the original design crew, it followed the same concepts, and they even released it as 'THE SEQUEL TO CHRONO TRIGGER'.
No. If Christopher Nolan and all the cast and crew of The Dark Knight turned around and made a movie about the life and times of a 1930's Vaudeville comedian, that would not be a sequel to The Dark Knight.
Even if they advertised it as "THE SEQUEL TO THE DARK KNIGHT.
It would simply be an unrelated game by the people who brought you The Dark Knight.
As for Chrono Cross "following the same concepts," time-travel and inter-dimensional travel are not one and the same. Sure, both are theoretical and highly unlikely, but so is Heidi Montag's ability to spell her own name.
Again, for the people in the back of the room, I am a huge fan of Chrono Cross. I've been waiting impatiently for it to be released on PSN.
All I'm saying is that there was a reason why the interactive novel Radical Dreamers (which Chrono Cross was an extrapolation of) was not called Chrono "Something."
Everybody needs to calm the f*ck down and put the guns away.
Posted: May 12th 2011 3:29PM SynthOno said
@Urethra Alfredo Well, Radical Dreamers wasn't called Chrono [something] because it was released on the Satellaview and would have had a very short shelf life, so they didn't want to make the game too important, knowing it'd disappear.
Chrono Cross IS A GOSH DARN SEQUEL to Chrono Trigger. It picks up after the events of the first game. It uses the events of the first game to build the story. The inter-dimensional travel is a device which is directly based on the damage jumping around time periods willy nilly caused.
It might not have been the sequel you wanted - presumably you wanted the old cast and more time travel - but it's by all definitions the sequel to the game.
Reply
Chrono Cross IS A GOSH DARN SEQUEL to Chrono Trigger. It picks up after the events of the first game. It uses the events of the first game to build the story. The inter-dimensional travel is a device which is directly based on the damage jumping around time periods willy nilly caused.
It might not have been the sequel you wanted - presumably you wanted the old cast and more time travel - but it's by all definitions the sequel to the game.
Posted: May 12th 2011 4:13PM Punkrawk Bbob said
@Urethra Alfredo
'As for Chrono Cross "following the same concepts," time-travel and inter-dimensional travel are not one and the same.'
Science would disagree. Space and time are one in the same. According to quantum mechanics and the many-worlds interpretation, all universes are occurring simultaneously, we are only able to observe one perceivable reality at a time though. Like human radios. So being able to travel through universes is just observing a split in the thread of reality that occurs at the same time, and being able to travel through time is observing another point along that same thread. So ultimately is the same thing.
Anyways, it's a shame you don't consider it a proper sequel - As denial is a bitch to get over.
Reply
'As for Chrono Cross "following the same concepts," time-travel and inter-dimensional travel are not one and the same.'
Science would disagree. Space and time are one in the same. According to quantum mechanics and the many-worlds interpretation, all universes are occurring simultaneously, we are only able to observe one perceivable reality at a time though. Like human radios. So being able to travel through universes is just observing a split in the thread of reality that occurs at the same time, and being able to travel through time is observing another point along that same thread. So ultimately is the same thing.
Anyways, it's a shame you don't consider it a proper sequel - As denial is a bitch to get over.
Posted: May 12th 2011 4:29PM Captain Underpants and the Bring said
@Urethra Alfredo actually, time and space are the same thing so time travel and inter-dimensional travel is the same thing as well.
Reply
Posted: May 12th 2011 5:23PM StClair said
I want a sequel to CT that does not render everything the beloved cast did in the last game moot by killing them off off-screen, to make way for a new set of characters. (Had the situation been explained to them, I'm certain they'd have jumped at the chance to set things right, as they did so many times before.)
While I'm at it, I'd also like a sequel which does not take EVERY chance it gets to hit the player with heavy-handed moralizing and hand-wringing about how humans are just the awfulest things on the face of the planet ever and the world would be better off without us. I consider myself pretty "green", but after 20+ hours of being preached at, I was about ready to go out and kill something out of pure spite.
Reply
While I'm at it, I'd also like a sequel which does not take EVERY chance it gets to hit the player with heavy-handed moralizing and hand-wringing about how humans are just the awfulest things on the face of the planet ever and the world would be better off without us. I consider myself pretty "green", but after 20+ hours of being preached at, I was about ready to go out and kill something out of pure spite.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:08PM (Unverified) said
Pfft, this company has not done anything innovative in years. Their title line us is dry and convoluted. The only new fans they generate are those who are told they must like FF7 in order to be cool amongst their friends.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:34PM ricochetguro said
@(Unverified)
If anything FF 13 was one of the most unique jrpgs in a long time. Whether you like it or not.
Reply
If anything FF 13 was one of the most unique jrpgs in a long time. Whether you like it or not.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:54PM aughscreennames said
True, I had never played an RPG as linear and mind numbing as FF13, it was innovative in ways to bore the shit out of me.
Reply
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:09PM SgtDookie said
I wonder if they are still trying get FF14 "fixed" and onto the PS3 or if they are just gonna keep a free to play policy and have it stay on PC.
I was under the assumption that the failure of FF14 was a pretty big deal to SE.
I was under the assumption that the failure of FF14 was a pretty big deal to SE.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:09PM Bekefel said
Name one exceptionally good game Square Enix has actually made.
Posted: May 12th 2011 12:18PM SynthOno said
@Bekefel Tactics Ogre is fantastic, though yeah it's an updated SNES title. Otherwise the Dragon Quests have remained really solid and The World Ends With You was quite good.
FFXIII, by contrast, seems to be about making FFXIII (In summary, a group of people is given a vague goal, no idea how to achieve it, and a crap reward but a tight deadline and the promise of bad things happening if they don't), and might indicate that the problems within SE stems from poor leadership and bad planning.
Reply
FFXIII, by contrast, seems to be about making FFXIII (In summary, a group of people is given a vague goal, no idea how to achieve it, and a crap reward but a tight deadline and the promise of bad things happening if they don't), and might indicate that the problems within SE stems from poor leadership and bad planning.








