| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (24)

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 5:06PM FriedConsole said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
I this another "joke" by GOG?

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 5:08PM SpiderPrime said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
GOG is awesome for the fact that it isn't trying to be steam and does away with the restrictions that steam has.

But if GOG did do more new releases like Witcher 2, I would get it from them always if there are never any DRMs on them and since they like updating their games to work on new OSs, I will always support GOG.com.

They are just plain awesome. ..... now I wait for Flashback to get on the service!

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 5:40PM Mmmmz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderPrime
Well, most of Steam's DRM is to satisfy publisher's stupidity so that they can get new releases. It's kind of like Netflix not being able to universally put out an App for android due to "DRM" concerns. Because, we all know piracy would just skyrocket if you could watch netflix on an unsecured mobile OS or if games didn't have DRM at all instead of DRM that never works.

Still, when GOG isn't doing stupid publicity stunts they are fighting a good fight for no exceptions to DRM free games. Many thought they wouldn't last but who knew paying customers didn't want DRM in their games?

Steam needs some competition and GOG is definitely one company I would like to see succeed more. There's room for one more company and hopefully they're no worse than Steam with DRM.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 6:17PM KazamaSogetsu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You're contradicting yourself. GoG is all about classic games, selling new releases would make them more Steam and less GoG. Witcher 2 was probably an exception because it went DRM-less in the last patch.

GoG is doing just fine on their niche, they should stay focused on it. Plus, they - or anyone else atm - can't really touch Valve's mammoth on its field.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 6:34PM Dao Jones said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@KazamaSogetsu
He's not really contradicting himself, I believe. The way he made it sound, he rather they stuck with old games but if they did sell more new games _without_ DRM, he would purchase it there before any other place that would have the same game with DRM.

Or something. :D
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 6:36PM Stevetrop Man of Mystery said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@SpiderPrime

Well The Witcher is an exception. You have to take in consideration CD Projekt owns GoG and is the publisher and developer for The Witcher.

They put out their latest game like how they do the older games. They can see that this works for them and they feel there is no need to change anything.

The amazing sales and the services they provide made me a dedicated fan of GoG for a while now.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 6:49PM Vagrant Zero said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@KazamaSogetsu TW2 was DRM-less on launch day assuming you bought the GoG addition. And they released TW2 on GOG because the developer of TW2 owns GOG and for no other reason.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 11:31AM FdUmCh said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 5:14PM Stevetrop Man of Mystery said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I'd be a sad panda if I saw GoG bought out. He is right I go to GoG for classic games or ones I missed out within the last 10 years.

When I want new games I'll go to steam or just purchase it in a store. GoG allows me to find that hidden treasure chest of games I lost when I moved from various houses in the past.

I was able to head back to classic games I loved growing up Planescape: Torment, Freespace 1 & 2, Fallout 1 & 2, Tex Murphy.

The fact they are getting classic EA, Lucas Arts, and Microsoft games just makes me wonder how much money of mine they are going to take.

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 5:15PM Timjoy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If GOG gets a windows client, I could see it as a viable platform solely focusing on retro gaming.

A huge step for them is figuring out a way to get older games to work without having to mess around with dosbox, or at least use dosbox in a seamless way that is invisible to the user.

Also if they could bring over old console games to GOG it would be a huge hit. Especially because the emulation technology already exists. They just need a way to use it legally.

It blows me away how slow Nintendo and Sega have been releasing their back catalog of games. Especially given the technology we have today.

It also blows me away that Duke Nukem Forever is coming out and we still don't have a version of the Duke 3D that easily works on Windows 7.

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 11:26AM b2742717 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Timjoy
So, what, they're not a "viable platform solely focusing on retro gaming" already? What do you mean? And they do have a Windows download client already. So, I don't understand your comment.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 5:22PM Hunter141072 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
They don´t really need to get bought by nobody, and that´s great news. History has shown us that when a company is bought it ends up being nothing but another gear of the company that bought them, just look at molyneaux first with bullfrog and then with lionhead, when EA bought bullfrog the amazing company that created only hits and original games was over, even molyneaux got tired of it, then he creates lionhead only to sell it to microsoft, and what happened??? he is now trapped in a dungeon called Fable, with no hope to escape from it. GOG is doing the right stuff staying free, when a big company appears the developers are trapped in a single game, usually the must famous one and they only keep creating the same thing over and over again, and for one platform must of the time, that´s not a good deal, specially because the first victim is creativity.

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 6:28AM Dehnus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Hunter141072 He's not stuck in a Dungeon, the man has the lead over all things XBOX in Europe and basically decides what rare has to do and Lionhead as well. Just because you don't like Fable, doesn't mean Bill Gates whips a Galley full of developers to row him from Microsoft to MS Europe each month crying woe and help me Hunter141072 with each lash of Mister Gates whip.

That being said, GOG rules and should stay independent. Because they WILL add DRM the moment EA, Valve, THQ,etc buys them.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 11:46AM Hunter141072 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dehnus


Well, it´s funny that you mention that, because overlooking this kind of "corporal decisions" was EXACTLY the reason why he got tired of bullfrog when EA bought it. Really tell me which other game he has developed for the last years??? fable 2.... fable III....and???? oh yeah!!! that milo demo that was useful for nothing, now tell me how many games he created when he was alone?? with bulllfrog: populous, populous 2, power monger, dungeon keeper, syndicate, flood, theme park, theme hospital, magic carpet. And in the few yearsthat lionhead was not part of microsoft: black & white, fable, the movies, black& white 2...... and now???? fable........ i think he is doing it right now more for the money than for the passion that he had for developing games, but that didn´t lasted too much the last time. Just look right now, which is the new game lionhead is working on?? mark my words you can be sure it´s going to be another fable game instead of something new.... the sad part is that peter used to be a developer that loved to create original stuff, but you are right this new "watch our company" job doesn´t gives him the freedom to create. that´s why GOG´s decision to stay free is the best one.
Reply

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 5:51PM ecbremner said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd love to see a GOG/Onlive hybrid. That I think would make me more willing to shell out for games feeling confidence that their age wont affect gameplay.

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 6:26PM Acosta02 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
GOG is amazing. Never used it until I read about an old game that sounded interesting... I checked their site for it and the price was so low I bought it on the spot.

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 6:57PM The Only Girl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So many of these game download sites... Which ones will prove superior in the end?

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 8:14PM Kompstrumpcziwadze said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
These are the kind of people we need more of in this industry where integrity seems to such a rare commodity.

Posted: Jun 3rd 2011 10:32PM original fred said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@xiaojiekhtyy
I keep reporting the spam and they keep being removed but they come back like hydras! LIKE HYDRAS. *rocks back and forth in fetal position*

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 3:10AM Marshillboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Steam and GOG aren't going after the same market, so there really isn't hardly any competition to be had.

Steam focuses on new releases and social networking, and GOG focuses on porting classic games to work on my Windows 7.

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 3:37AM wcarnation said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Marshillboy I'd say at least 90% of my Steam library is old games
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 6:32AM Dehnus said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@wcarnation Then you are screwed you bought it at Steam and filled with DRM ;). YAY GOG! keep at it with your fight against DRM. We the people salute you!
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 2:31PM Marshillboy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@wcarnation

Every old game I've bought on steam they never bothered to make sure worked on any OS newer than windows 2000. Most are broken beyond belief and its up to me, the paying customer, to get it properly working.

That's why GOG exists.
Reply

Posted: Jun 4th 2011 11:34AM b2742717 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
First off, I'll say that I'm a huge GOG fan. I've been a member for nearly 3 years, since the very beginning of the beta, and I own about 30 games on the service. So, I think it's fantastic.

I will say, though, that I think that some of the adulation they get about being DRM-free, and the heaps of praise they get for their supposed "fight against DRM," is kind of unwarranted, or at least, blown out of proportion, given the context of what they sell. GOG sells games that are mostly 10 to 25 years old, that never had DRM in the first place. Like, wow, I can buy Baldur's Gate, and it won't have online activation limits? Hooray!

They have this reputation as being these holy anti-DRM crusaders, and while it is cool that they don't, like, go back and add new DRM to games like Myst and Duke Nukem 3D, it just doesn't seem like selling these old games the way they already were, DRM-free to begin with, should earn them that much credit with the anti-DRM crowd. The stunt with GOG being the only one with The Witcher 2 DRM-free at launch is worthy of praise, but that only lasted a couple weeks before it got patched out from all copies.

For the most part, GOG's DRM-free stance just comes with the territory of selling games that mostly predate the term "DRM" to begin with.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW