| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (48)

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:07PM ThePotato said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
God, that Onion video is so great...

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:13PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ThePotato

The Onion FTMFW!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:43PM iceytoa1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ThePotato
May I ask what Onion video?
Link please?
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:20PM Protege420 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@iceytoa1
"started catering to older readers"
its a link click on it i swear.......... well no not my text the article's a link .........wait what the whole article isnt a link..... confused yet?...... goooood
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:08PM Faceless Troll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think I've got to rough you up some for calling me gentle.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:43PM Faceless Troll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Lucky48 potatoe potatoh
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:09PM Peril said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Battlefield 3.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:23PM FriedConsole said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Peril

As someone who played a lot of Battlefield games, I don't see the game taking over the CoD audience. I haven't been paying attention to Battlefield 3. Is it now just a CoD clone? That sucks if it is.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:44PM The Cole Train said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@FriedConsole For someone who has apparently "played a lot of Battlefield games", you don't seem to know much about the series and how it is the polar opposite of Call of Duty
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:52PM PbFarmer said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@The Cole Train To be fair I think the opposite of Battlefield 3 or Call of Duty would be something like; The history of ladders, a written autobiography by an unknown writer. They are both FPS that take combat on a global scale. The differing factors between them is one is more class based on a specific scale with much more destructible environments, and the other is a cash cow. To be fair, I do love MW2, but people shouldn't become so polarized by video games.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:54PM FriedConsole said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@The Cole Train

That is why I said it won't take over the CoD audience because it is a different game.

Maybe you should read my comment again saying the words slowly out loud. Feel free to ask you parents for help.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 6:01PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Peril

lol you all got trolled into this argument.

i envy you peril
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:09PM leobebes said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Time has lent their magazine cover to various movies as a mock up for a certain character's "Person of the Year". This is no different and if it causes an uproar then it's probably due to another episode of anti video game bias.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:44PM iceytoa1 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@leobebes
"Tony Stark, WANTS TO SAVE THE WORLD!"?
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:12PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Too bad the fake cover isn't terribly exciting. Should be a pic of the Statue of Liberty with her head missing or something more dramatic. Instead it's "hey that building on the right is busted and there's a bit of smoke".

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:21PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@343 Guilty Fart

you're right. it shouldn't be dramatic, it should be cliche. Plus Cloverfield did that already.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@PR0F3TA
Deus Ex did that years before Cloverfield.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:15PM Nervous Nick said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified) And Escape From New York did it before Deus Ex.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:23PM Protege420 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Nervous Nick
i was gonna say that!!!
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:41PM A Sandwich said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Nervous Nick

Did anybody do it before Planet of the Apes?
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 6:03PM PR0F3TA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 6:09PM 343 Guilty Fart said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The point is that the pic should be more dramatic. Why would a photographer take this picture? It's not really of anything.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 11:37PM BananaBoat said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@343 Guilty Fart - Don't worry; Modern Warfare 3 is going through all of the New York cliches, just like Crysis 2 did earlier this year. Nothing is going to be left out.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:19PM TheShaper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Still not buying it.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:20PM TheShaper said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@TheShaper
The magazine, I mean. The game, only time will tell.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:29PM whylekat said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@TheShaper

The game will be exactly like the last 3 CoD's. They never change or get upgrades. They just keep raking your moneys up for the same shitty product twice a year.
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:28PM (Unverified) said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
DAY 1 PURCHASE!

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:30PM spekkio said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Are you trying to tell me Moot was only person of the year because TIME wanted to appeal to 13 year old boys?

I'm devastated.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:29PM milespieri said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@spekkio No. moot was Person of the Year because 4chan rigged the poll.

"Marblecake, also the game"
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:32PM burjeffton said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Ha! They called TIME "journalism!"

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:39PM Schlecht said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One thing I'd like to point out is that I'm pretty sure Time wouldn't be publishing that headline after we've already been attacked like that. Awesome promotion, though

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 4:59PM TheDarkWayne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't watch any of the call of duty videos, was this in the trailers in the vein of "Iron Man stabilizes East West relations" fake covers? Or was it an actual print release with a stunt cover?

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:00PM Adhesive said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
wow time magazine....talk bout the dinosaur media.
Print media trying to stay relevant. The interwebz
is the place get your news. Too badd its mostly biased left or right

Mi gusta

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:00PM Pennegan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously, Time was paid a shit load of Money under the table by Activision, and that's why their so polite about it, any controversy will only be good for sales on both sides.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:30PM MLC said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought it was a cool fake cover.

Oh well...

Whatever...

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:32PM ColeM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I honestly thought that was for Crysis 2 until just now. At this point, a game would be way different if it took place in a made up middle-eastern country. Seems like everyone is making New York or some other big city the setting of their game.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 5:38PM kyte420 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
With Time involved I thought they'd include a collection of 80's music or the like.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 6:03PM Misfit Toy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I haven't picked up a Time magazine in like a decade. Maybe next time I'm at the bookstore I'll skim through it to see if any articles catch my attention. Willing to give it a try, but if its still not for me - its still not for me.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 6:36PM Cube said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Bah! In the UK the newspapers allow companies to make adverts that look like the real paper and then put the advert right on the front page.

With paid papers it isn't done too often - but one issue of the Daily Express confused me when the main headline was "London Thrown Into Puzzling Stare of Affairs" and the article said that Professor Layton was on the case.

The Times should do that with this. Now THAT would cause some attention.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 7:04PM watchall said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Here's my Battlefield 3 version http://yfrog.com/h8t7ufpj http://yfrog.com/h0r3xtdj

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 7:35PM Sprue Rubbles said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@watchall Very nice!
Reply

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 7:46PM AMonkey said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder how much Activision had to pay for that.

Posted: Jun 13th 2011 8:45PM peter pham said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
lmao xD the onion video was greatt

Posted: Jun 14th 2011 12:19AM Kif said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What is this "magazine" thing I've been hearing so much of? Is it a threat to my internet?

Posted: Jun 14th 2011 10:05AM The Albatross said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Nation!? Baaahahahahahaha.

:ahem: Sorry.

Bwaaahahahaha.

Posted: Jun 14th 2011 10:39AM RandomfragLOL said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like call of duty 3 re-skinned to modern times. Oh wait it is.... The first showing of a game that comes out in a few months looks very dissapointing for a COD game. RIP IW for firing the guys that MADE this game great. BF3 actually shows some innovation.

Posted: Jun 14th 2011 11:42AM The Only Girl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
They shouldn't even need to do this anyway. TIME has interesting articles and even separate issues for young readers.

Posted: Jun 14th 2011 12:52PM gangcar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Also, Activision drove up to our office with a dump truck full of money."

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW