| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (19)

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 12:24AM MarkezJM said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm kinda surprised it was only 10. Is that moreso a function of crafty spies, or the AI partygoer motions/movements being well done and not sticking out like a sore thumb? Been really interested in hearing about this and was wondering if it'd actually hold up as an enjoyable playable experience.

You play, Richard? If so, how'd you do?

Posted: Jun 18th 2011 4:22PM checker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MarkezJM It's mostly just that there were only 35 games played that night, so 10 just means 29% Sniper kills. I talk about the slight Spy bias in the blog post (I'm also counting the Spy running out of time for the Sniper right now, which brings the total to 37%). I'm testing some tutorializing techniques that give the Spy a slight advantage in the early games as part of the playtests. There's more info in the post.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 12:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like fun i would live to give it a try.
As well as that you spelt "know" wrong, just saying.

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 12:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)
ah Love* i spelt something wrong :(
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 12:26AM LoveYouSomeEric said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You could, of course, have argued that we are a crafty bunch if 30 spies were shot, no? I mean, both sides are trying to be crafty.

Panderer! ;)

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 12:29AM JMGQ said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
"... he doesn't quite [kn]no[w] what [to] do with the data ..."

"[Pour] over lots more data ..."

Nice, my first douchebag post ;)

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 12:36AM Evin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@JMGQ Mr. Mitchell dropped the ball..
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 12:39AM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@JMGQ

Wow, Rich, what the heck happened?
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 1:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@JMGQ Was just about to post those!
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 1:57AM Rooshma said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

pore 2
verb [ intrans. ] ( pore over/through)
be absorbed in the reading or study of : Heather spent hours poring over cookbooks.
• archaic think intently; ponder : when he has thought and pored on it.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 4:32AM Marco le Polo said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@JMGQ

It's freaking late! That's what happened.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 9:34AM RichardMitchell said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@JMGQ

I admit to the typos, but "pore" is correct.
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 1:56AM Epsilon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I accidentally the whole data. What do?

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 2:03AM Darric said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I played this at the meetup, and first, it's aces, and second it seems like the disadvantage snipers seemed to have was very much due to the environment of new players, not knowing what to look for. It's pretty straightforward to go about your objectives as a spy, and even if you don't, by the time the timer approaches zero, the sniper will usually panic and shoot anyone - this wouldn't be a problem for those with more experience, I imagine.

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 8:38AM Tihn said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Wish I hadn't wasted my time playing this at E3.

Posted: Jun 18th 2011 4:00PM checker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tihn Hi there, I don't actually think you played the game at E3, I think you're just trolling. You posted similar comments in the previous SpyParty E3 post (http://www.joystiq.com/2011/06/07/e3-reader-meetup-spyparty/), implying you've played it and didn't like it (plus some bonus general anti-indie nonsense), but now you're saying you played it at E3. I watched all of the games, took pictures of most of the playsessions, and talked to the people who played, and I'm guessing you weren't one of them.

I'm 100% okay with people not liking the game if they've played it, and feedback is super useful, but posting troll comments without having played the game is pretty weak.

If you can, come to PAX West this year and actually give it a try, and if you still hate it, post away. If you do end up hating it, it would also be helpful to post what you didn't like about it, since well-thought-out criticism is very valuable.

Thanks!
Reply

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 3:46PM PN04 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What's up with the two shot lines that seem to miss the room entirely?

Posted: Jun 17th 2011 10:55PM MacMog said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@PN04

Those aren’t shot lines. They’re position + sight direction lines for the sniper over the course of one game. See the linked blog post for details.
Reply

Posted: Jun 18th 2011 4:24PM checker said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MacMog Yeah, exactly, although PN04 has a good point, I should make an image of all the final shots to see if there's any pattern!
Reply

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW