Need for Speed: Shift developer Slightly Mad Studios is breaking out the big guns with a crowdsourced funding scheme titled World of Mass Development, or WMD (see what we did there?), which will take its first run with a new racing game, C.A.R.S. Through WMD, Slightly Mad will release C.A.R.S.' crowdfunded technology to subscribers, who can then help develop the game and reap a return on their investments once it launches. Slightly Mad will take 30 percent of the profits, with the rest divided among the community investors based on the amount of shares they own.
Slightly Mad expects C.A.R.S. to take two years and $5 million to produce. With shares priced from $5-$100,000 for individuals, groups or companies, Slightly Mad expects a $10 share will return $35, $250 to return $875 and $100,000 will return $350,000 -- if the game makes $25 million in profit. Slightly Mad has a goal to sell 3 million copies of C.A.R.S., earn a profit of $52 million and receive a 90 percent on Metacritic.
"Traditional development puts developers at the mercy of publishers," Slightly Mad said. "The development process offered by WMD shifts the focus back to creating great games that your target audience wants to play, whilst still offering the chance to get proper funding for development and testing."
Reader Comments (14)
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 5:39PM MegaGoat said
Translation: We couldn't find anyone to back our project
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 5:43PM killerjuice said
This is a really cool idea, but I feel like it's not going to get many sales. 90% on metacritic and 3 million sales is a big expectation if they only plan on having a 5 million budget. NFS shift sold 4 million copies and got low 80s on metacritic, but that had a budget well over 5 million and lots of marketing from EA.
I like the idea though and I might buy a $25 share just to see what happens.
I like the idea though and I might buy a $25 share just to see what happens.
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 5:44PM (Unverified) said
Slightly mad.... Full blown crazy is more like it.
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 5:57PM DevilSei said
@(Unverified)
Because apparently 100/100 is obviously a little silly to hope for! Glad they settled on a much simpler 90%.
Because apparently 100/100 is obviously a little silly to hope for! Glad they settled on a much simpler 90%.
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 6:11PM freaparn said
This probably would've done well back in the days of the internet bubble when people were sinking their retirement funds into website stocks.
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 6:39PM Drakkenfyre said
Why do I expect this to fail horribly. Players invest a ton of cash, and the game either doesn't come out, or does, and investors see almost nothing to the promised return rate, sparking a scam investigation?
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 7:01PM blackangel209 said
@Drakkenfyre No offense to the studio, but a scam is exactly what this sounds like.
Reply
Posted: Sep 25th 2011 10:42AM Mcmax3000 said
@Drakkenfyre - I'll admit that I've only read the article and nothing on their website so I could be missing something but I don't see a "promised return".
I see some examples of what the return will be if they make a specific amount of money and some projections of how they hope the game will do but nothing that has been promised.
Reply
I see some examples of what the return will be if they make a specific amount of money and some projections of how they hope the game will do but nothing that has been promised.
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 6:53PM arucious said
I'm trying to find the pun... I don't see it :[
Posted: Sep 24th 2011 8:28PM Haggard said
This sounds like the best, most utopian idea for game development ever. Not sure what the negativity is for - it probably will not succeed (no doubt helped by the title), but making a game that based on what the players want, rather than what the execs and marketing division think they want is a real ray of hope.
Posted: Sep 25th 2011 1:28AM Courtney said
Bunch of negative nellies around here today.
Posted: Sep 25th 2011 3:25AM fid said
i have been playing racing games since the days of pole position at the roller rink, and nfs:sh!t is in my top 3 worst driving games ever, and the AI solidly holds the top spot for worst ever.
i will not be 'investing'.
i will not be 'investing'.






