| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (228)

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:34PM LinkRazr said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I still have over 200gb here, So I'm good.

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:21PM Co said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Sounds like 360 is getting a little long in the tooth.

Point PS3.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:28PM DrunkRaba said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@LinkRazr 210 here, bring it on! I would take all 22 GB if they would let my PS3.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:44PM arkweld said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Co

Multiple discs on the 360 isn't a big deal IF you can just install all the discs to the drive and then play with just the first disc permanently in the tray.

It's the physical act of disc swapping that is so archaic now that is not acceptable. It's stupid. And before anyone jumps in with their "laziness" defense, take the batteries out of your TV remote and start changing channels manually then you can bring it up.

I'll be playing this on the PC anyway.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:49PM Mcmax3000 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@arkweld - Your TV remote analogy only works if you're changing TV channels once every 30 hours or so.

They've even said that you'll have hardly any reason to go back to the first disc once you finish it so it's not like you have to get up to change discs every five seconds.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 9:37PM ShingoEX said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Co How so? You make it sound like top-of-the-line gaming units (like PC) don't have multi-disc games.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 10:44PM Ballistic H said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Mcmax3000

"... you'll have hardly any reason to go back to the first disc once you finish it..."

So it's linear and not open world?
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 11:18PM eNriqeu said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Mcmax3000
Rage lasts about 15 hours, just so you know...
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 11:24PM Slight of Ham said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Co...Hey clownshoes, let me know how RAGE plays on the Wii.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 11:24PM Kenoji said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@LinkRazr -- Man, I wonder how many discs Skyrim is going to be on the 360.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 11:56PM Mcmax3000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Ballistic H - I have no idea but the article says "There isn't a reason to disc-swap after completing the first half".

This isn't personally a game I'm particularly interested in so I know nothing about its layout or length (re: eNriqeu - I was just throwing out a number to illustrate my point).
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 11:57PM Mcmax3000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Kenoji - I believe I read somewhere that Skyrim was confirmed to be one disc on 360.
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 3:54AM 04k3R said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@ShingoEX they don't and it's called Steam. The need for even one disk is archaic as far as I'm concerned.
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 9:29AM Darki Dreamside said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Kenoji

One.
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 1:33PM Opuelas said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@arkweld
That's a terrible example when referring to disc swapping inside of one game--c'mon now, stop with they hyperbole.
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 4:52PM arkweld said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@YourMomsLover

Yes it is f'kn stupid. This is the sort of thing we were putting up with 15 years ago and you're telling me that a game cannot be played by a full install of all three discs and then using one for verification purposes - as they've done on PC for over a decade?

And the remote analogy still works. It's irrelevant how many times you have to get up. It's convenience. Do you want to take the batteries out of your remote and go back to manually switching channels and changing the volume even if it's only every hour? No of course you don't, because you know there's a better and more convenient way and you will choose that every time.

Like the concept of wired controllers (or wired remote controls) disc swapping is archaic and ridiculous. Not helped by the Xbox Arcade which needs to die. It's another case of progress being held back by the few who don't want to upgrade.
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 9:59PM Mcmax3000 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@arkweld a) No, the way the 360 works is that you need to put in the proper disc just like if you were playing from the disc. All the install does is improve load times.

b) If I have to get up once every 10-15 hours of TV watching to change the channel, it's not the end of the world.

I'd rather have to get up once or twice & get more content in my game than have it cut in half or by two thirds.
Reply

Posted: Sep 28th 2011 4:39PM Dale P said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Co One has a fast but low capacity disk format, the other has a slow but high capacity disk format. It's pretty much neck and neck.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:35PM chromekreeper said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
22GB?! Holy crap that is just outrageous. Rage better deliver if its going to do that.

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:39PM Tommy758 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@chromekreeper Will you RAGE if it doesn't?
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:44PM Arsenic13 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Tommy758

Such an outRAGE
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:46PM The Cole Train said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@Tommy758
Da dun tsh
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:55PM undead77 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@chromekreeper

22GB is not that large in today's standards. The game "Age of Conan" from a few years ago, installed at almost 30GB.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:50PM MW49350 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@ozlacs No... Just no.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 10:52PM mu93n said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@chromekreeper

HULK.....RAGE?!
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 9:01AM Cap Morgan said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@mu93n

No Hulk SMASH!!!!!!!
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:35PM TurbineTech said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
I don't care what I have to do to play it. I'm prepared to offer my first born. Bring it on already!

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:35PM RobertCarr said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
8 gbs!?!? I really need to upgrade from my launch 60gb ps3 :/

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:47PM SecondTomorrow said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@RobertCarr
2.5" harddrives aren't exactly expensive.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:50PM Hank Hill said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@RobertCarr You really should. I upgraded from a 40gb to a 160gb and never looked back. There's an immense feeling of satisfaction going through your entire game collection and installing all the data to your hard-drive, and going through your PSN game list and redownloading everything you own, safe in the knowledge that you'll never have to uninstall any of it ever again.

I've also got a load of PS3 demo discs from my magazine subscription, so I went ahead and installed a tonne of demos from them too. I never play them, I just like having them on my hard-drive. I've even got Pro-pain on there, just for kicks.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:55PM MystcLazrDragon said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@RobertCarr
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136197
I just got one a few weeks ago, it works like a charm.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:01PM RobertCarr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Hank Hill
Ya it's a pain installing and unstalling games, hopefully I can get around to it soon :)...what's the best way to back up ps3 saves?
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:04PM RobertCarr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@MystcLazrDragon
That's perfect, thank you :)
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:12PM 1OhhOne said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Hank Hill Downloading for the sake of downloading?
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:25PM MystcLazrDragon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@RobertCarr
You're very welcome good sir
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 9:12PM Rick1220 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@RobertCarr

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822152291

You need to put this 1TB HDD in your PS3.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 9:42PM afrosheen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@RobertCarr I replaced my 120gb with a 120gb SSD, things are faster now.
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 3:58AM dargondarkfire said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@afrosheen
i went to buy one once and the only store i within a 2 hour drive that might carry them is best buy in rapids city.. a 2 hour drive away.... well i get there and i see 2.5s and ask a gaming asociate for help and he goes and shows and tells me i need a standard full size hard drive then tells me i can only use 32 gigs of its capacity for the console's storage?

um i should really only need a blank 2.5 and just switch the drives out right?
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 6:55AM LEONLEONLEON said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@RobertCarr

I got a 500GB HDD for my PS3 for £10 less than a new game costs.
Reply

Posted: Sep 26th 2011 10:45AM frenzy said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Hank Hill Did you buy any Pro-Pain accessories to go with it?
Reply

Posted: Sep 27th 2011 9:09AM teeftwo said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
@Hank Hill

lol you bought a new PS3 for $300 to get 160 GB? For that you could've bought a Hard Drive with 500 GB and just stick it in the PS3. fail.
Reply

Posted: Oct 1st 2011 7:23PM Hank Hill said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@teeftwo My old PS3 died from YLOD. Jesus christ I'm not that stupid.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:36PM Godslegion said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Now to decide whether I shall purchase it for my 360 or Ps3...hmmmm! Can't wait regardless! The Massive rpg's all releasing now are looking so hot! Just got Dead Island, can't wait for Rage, and then Skyrim!!!!

Ohhh giggity!

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:40PM (Unverified) said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@Godslegion

22 gig install and 3 discs vs 8gig install and 1 disc... hmm such a tough decision.

/sarcasm
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:47PM zefur said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
@(Unverified)

PS3 takes ages to install anything
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:50PM Mcmax3000 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified) - You could also look at it as mandatory install vs. optional install.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 7:57PM Huey2k2 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

The number of discs isn't an issue for me. It's a question of which game runs better.

Whichever platform it runs better on will be the one I play it on.
Reply

Posted: Sep 25th 2011 8:06PM Godslegion said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified)

I was thinking moreso on a performance/graphical standpoint, but margins are pretty close these days on those two fronts. However it is pretty tough to think, 3 discs versus 8 gigs, and yes PS3 does take quite a while to install.

Like I said, doesn't matter, the game was born to rock regardless, at least it looks that way!
Reply

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW