| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Massively, and more

Reader Comments (46)

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 2:32PM PlagueDoctor357 said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
How much better does this bad boy look on PC? I'd totally play it and buy it again if it's a huge improvement.

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:19PM Apakal said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
@PlagueDoctor357

Assuming you have a nVidia card in the 560 range with PhysX...

See for yourself: http://www.geforce.com/News/articles/exclusive-physx-in-batman-arkham-city-a-first-look
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:24PM Warlock234 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Apakal
Wow, the PhysX makes a huge difference! I got this game for free with my GTX 560 Ti, can't wait for PC release.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:27PM Apakal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Warlock234

I'm eyeballing that same deal, but I need to upgrade my PSU as well if I do pull the trigger, so I'm waiting a little bit. I'm very poor.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:49PM Hunter141072 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@PlagueDoctor357


The first one was AWESOME i think its one of the best games visually speaking on the p.c. really amazing, specially if you have an nvidia card, but even if you don´t it´s still fantastic, no doubt the best version of all available was the p.c. one and i´m sure this one is no exception.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 5:00PM Misguided Terran said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Warlock234
Hey I got the same deal too, I was just looking for a new card when my current one kept overheating.

I had no idea I was getting icing on top of the free cake! Or... hmm, what's a better metaphor?
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 5:31PM jchan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Warlock234

Just bought a bunch of parts for my new gaming rig, and got the GTX560TI with the AC code too. I can't wait after seeing the vid posted above!
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 11:49PM Nicknamer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Warlock234

Count me in on the 560 + Free Batman club. I knew I wanted to upgrade before Batman was released, and decided on a Superclocked EVGA 560. Then I saw it came with Batman for free, sealing the already sealed deal.

Double sealing. Mmmmmmmmmm.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 2:36PM Tradio said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
this game is in DX11? cool tessellation and DOF included?

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 2:56PM TheUnnamable said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Tradio Yes. :)
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 2:38PM Dick Socrates said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Minium and Recommended CPU hardly differ. :/

Dead Rising 2 OTR also recommends 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo. I tried it on my 2Ghz and it ran fine, any performance problems were to do with my card, not CPU (I know this, I did tests.)

So it's all a bit weird.

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 2:52PM Special Agent Steve said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dick Socrates
CPU doesn't material as much as GPU. All you need is a dual to quad core to run most games.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:29PM Apakal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Dick Socrates

CPU pans out to more importance in multiplayer games and MMO group play, where a lot more simultaneous calculations are going on per second.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:49PM Dick Socrates said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Apakal Yeah, and advanced/lots of AI and physics etc. Which is what puzzles me about AC, because the CPU needed for Arkham Asylum was much lower and AC doesn't appear to do much that AA didn't, apart from the streaming.

AA Minimum: CPU: Intel Pentium 4 3GHz or AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Recommended: Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz.

Playing AA with my 2Ghz Core 2 Duo I don't think I ever ran into a single CPU related issue. If fighting 10 guys simulataneously doesn't do it, I don't know what will! I guess even if there was slow down, I wouldn't see it because my card is already making the game run at about 30.

I'd like to know what they mean by minimum. The minimum to run it at 60fps?
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 4:57PM jackal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Apakal

"CPU pans out to more importance in multiplayer games and MMO group play, where a lot more simultaneous calculations are going on per second."

It's a bit more complicated than that since most modern engines and APIs (specifically DX11) are designed to take advantage of as many cores or threads as they possibly can. MT Framework titles, for example, are heavily threaded and you'll see a tangible performance increase when moving from a dual core to a quad core CPU with all other things being equal (same architecture, clock speed, etc.). Deus Ex: HR and Crysis 2 are both nigh unplayable on a dual core system, as are current generation Rockstar PC titles. DICE's games also benefit heavily from multiple cores, and newer UE3 titles don't run well unless they have at least 4 threads to work with. The days of dual core CPUs being viable for PC gaming are coming to an end.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 8:21PM Esposch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@jackal

This man speaks the truth. I noticed a huge FPS increase in Crysis 1, Deus Ex: HR and Metro 2033 when going from my E8200@3.6 to a Q6600@3.0.

In most games a dual core is more than enough, though.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 8:58PM Jennacide said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@jackal
I call bullshit on DX:HR not being playable on a dual core. Using a 3.1Ghz dual, with only a 9800GT graphics card. Run almost settings in DX at high, with AA at 4x and AF at 8x, never dips below 60fps.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 2:53PM Deividas said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hell yea. Maxed out here I come!

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 2:56PM damnreds said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
detecting cat-cleavage as well

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:03PM nerdydesi1 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I hope the PC version gets all the DLC the console version is getting. At least it looks like its getting the Catwoman DLC.

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:10PM renhoelder said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The GeForce GTX shows how good it can look, with all the PhysX and Tesselation
http://youtu.be/9_UNRp7Wrog

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:10PM milliniar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
is it just me or is that one of the highest "Recommended" gpu's around

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:25PM Apakal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@milliniar

Battlefield 3 is the only thing I can think of that recommends slightly higher. Most everything else is still recommending 5000 series ATI cards and equivalent nVidia cards.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:12PM Motoko21 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Physx! Yay. Also, Steam says the 15th of november.. ?

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:14PM Timjoy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've had the same pc since 2008 and it still runs all modern games fine...should be good for another few years it looks like...

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:20PM Apakal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Timjoy

My PC has a 4850 and I can run most anything on medium settings at the least, but I'm upgrading this year for sure.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 9:00PM Jennacide said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Timjoy
Unless you want to play Battlefield 3. Most everything is still built with mid to lower end computers in mind, even Rage runs fine on a 9800GT card. Battlefield 3, however, wouldn't even run reasonably well at lowest settings.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:33PM CaptainEternity99 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Im sorry...but 17.5 GB??????
I hope it actually works in a 64 bit unlike Arkham Asylum

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:49PM HellFiend said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@CaptainEternity99

64bit works without any issue. I have played Arkham Asylum 2 times through on Windows 7 x64.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 4:05PM Faceless Troll said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@CaptainEternity99 Get a PC That doesn't suck. I didn't have any trouble running AA on mine.
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2011 6:56PM CaptainEternity99 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Faceless Troll

I CAN run it I meet the specs but somehow it never worked on me, downloaded from Steam
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:41PM OmgUmad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
When i scrolled past the picture quickly i swear i saw nipple. Turns out it was just some sweet lighting my laptop cant handle. /sigh

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 3:56PM grumpyzrp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hey this is just a heads up! If you recently bought a GTX 500 series card (excluding the 550 ti) from Tiger Direct (Before the FREE Batman game promo) You can email TigerDirect, and they will send you a game code for the FULL game. I just did this last week, and they promptly helped me out. :D

PS. this game looks great!! It will be even better with Physx and 3D Vision

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 4:07PM grumpyzrp said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
after looking at the system specs.. i realized how much memory games take nowadays.. I remember when i would freak out if a game was half a GB!.. but now.. almost 20GB? lol I guess this is the norm.. but still. that's a lot

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 4:20PM rullers said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Damn. My 6850 already is just a ''recommended''?
That worries me.

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 4:27PM dude3991 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@rullers
Same for my GTX 460... I am slightly comforted by the fact that it is an MSI overclocked one but hope I can play this on at least medium or console it is...
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 6:24PM Startbuttonnews said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@dude3991

I have a GTX 460 as well and I can't imagine we won't be able to max this game out. I have maxed out every game I have played with it sans Witcher 2 (and that's just the 3D elements I can't do).
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 7:25PM jackal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@rullers

Since Rocksteady's promised some very liberal use of displacement mapping and tessellation in environmental geometry (tessellated character meshes are a given), that's probably why the "recommended" requirements are so high; anything slower than an HD 5830, HD 6850, or GTX 460 simply doesn't have the grunt necessary to render the massive increase of vertices found in a scene when going from DX9 to DX11.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 6:27PM nrkist2424 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seriously? Excited for Arkham Asylum but the physx portion not so much. It's a good idea to have dedicated hardware for this sort of stuff...but where has it gone in all this time. Apparently it can push generic rectangles on you. Sparks in the one scene are obviously 2d rectangular sprites manipulated by the physx engine. The sheets of paper blowing around in the wind...rectangular sprites manipulated by physx engine. The shattering glass scene is the worst offender as glass DOES NOT LOOK LIKE a bunch of 2d sprites. I don't really think Physx is accomplishing what Ageia or NVIDIA intended, and I don't think some 3d transform on the most basic of 2d sprites is that impressive nor the effect that great looking.

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 6:45PM Steel Toad said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"to get our WASD-lovin' keyboard claws on the PC version "

Speak for yourself. I use a wireless 360 gamepad with all my games on the PC.

Phenom II X4 965 / Radeon HD 5870 will cut through this like hot knife through butter.

ST

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 7:08PM Enosoma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have two GTX 460s, I don't think I'll have a problem.

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 7:09PM Enosoma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Enosoma
& 8 gigs of ram
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 8:25PM Esposch said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Enosoma

I'm sure you get all the girls.
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 8:27PM Enosoma said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Esposch

You couldn't imagine
Reply

Posted: Oct 23rd 2011 10:44AM TheKbob said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Enosoma Two 460s here too, man!

Let's max out some Batman!
Reply

Posted: Oct 22nd 2011 7:49PM This Little Man Says His Name Is said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wish they'd use a physics engine which actually supports more then 1 brand.

Featured Stories

Image

Silver Lining: I Am Alive's unfeeling world

Posted on May 25th 2012 7:30PM

Image

Game Of Thrones and the paradoxes of adaptation

Posted on May 25th 2012 5:00PM

Engadget

Engadget

TUAW

TUAW

Massively

Massively

WoW

WoW