Microsoft has quietly altered its Windows Live ID login in response to a reported security concern. Last week, a brute force hack was exposed, with Microsoft's phrasing of error codes and infinite attempts to access accounts helping hackers along. The security flaw gained more exposure due to the ongoing "FIFA hack" and related security concerns.
"Before it would just let you try over and over," Jason Coutee, the IT consultant credited with exposing the flaw, wrote Joystiq. "But now ... they handle the sign in request on the server in a way that it will stop replying after about 20 attempts."
Coutee feels that Microsoft tightened the security, but didn't make any noticeable changes on the front end.
"Good news is that at least they lengthened the time it would take to brute force Live IDs."
Microsoft notes that the exploit was not a loophole in Xbox.com, but a brute force attack that is an "industry-wide issue."
Reader Comments (56)
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 9:50AM SokakuTakeda said
@eat it Some, certainly not most. That "flaw", if you want to call it that, is definitely not the only reason some accounts were accessed. You can only do so much to protect people from their own stupidity and laziness. At some people people have to take responsiblity for themselves.
Reply
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 10:57AM jsx92 said
As long as the carrot is dangling (FIFA trading card packs) people will continue to find exploits and phish other users. Take away the carrot and the horse stops running, it's simple logic... stop selling FIFA cards (or at least patch the broken scratch-card scam DLC so you can't trade them)... but cash rules everything around us, from Italy/Russia/Poland all the way to Redmond, Washington.
Microsoft might need some security updates, but EA is the company profiting off all of this.
Reply
Microsoft might need some security updates, but EA is the company profiting off all of this.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 12:33PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@Sokaku Takeda
Could you please elaborate on why this is the consumers fault and not the fault of MS? I don't understand your argument. MS obviously has recognized the issue by changing it's woefully inadequate security measures on signing into your windows live Id account. It would seem accounts were compromised because of the sign in process that allowed for infinite attempts to sign into account. It also allowed said hackers to know whether there was an XBL account associated with that particular address because of difference in the displayed error message.
Should people have different secured randomized passwords for their various online accounts? Yes. But, if you give someone with the means infinite opportunities to crack a password it really wouldn't matter how secure the password is because it'd eventually be hacked as well. It's a deterrent but it's effectiveness is diminished if there isn't adequate measures in place by the company entrusted with secyring the data. If a thief has all the time in the world to crack a safe it'll eventually be cracked regardless of the sophistication of the combination.
Reply
Could you please elaborate on why this is the consumers fault and not the fault of MS? I don't understand your argument. MS obviously has recognized the issue by changing it's woefully inadequate security measures on signing into your windows live Id account. It would seem accounts were compromised because of the sign in process that allowed for infinite attempts to sign into account. It also allowed said hackers to know whether there was an XBL account associated with that particular address because of difference in the displayed error message.
Should people have different secured randomized passwords for their various online accounts? Yes. But, if you give someone with the means infinite opportunities to crack a password it really wouldn't matter how secure the password is because it'd eventually be hacked as well. It's a deterrent but it's effectiveness is diminished if there isn't adequate measures in place by the company entrusted with secyring the data. If a thief has all the time in the world to crack a safe it'll eventually be cracked regardless of the sophistication of the combination.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 2:41PM R Planteer said
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell
If people didn't have stupidly short passwords it wouldnt matter.
If a brute force attacker tried to guess my password a 1000 times a second, it would take them over 100 years to guess.
If your password is under 12 digits, at a bare minimum, for something as crucial as your email account, you're doing it wrong.
http://xkcd.com/936/
That being said, the changes MS made were certainly for the better. Hopefully the stupid ones will be better protected from themselves now.
Reply
If people didn't have stupidly short passwords it wouldnt matter.
If a brute force attacker tried to guess my password a 1000 times a second, it would take them over 100 years to guess.
If your password is under 12 digits, at a bare minimum, for something as crucial as your email account, you're doing it wrong.
http://xkcd.com/936/
That being said, the changes MS made were certainly for the better. Hopefully the stupid ones will be better protected from themselves now.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 3:49PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@R Planateer
The first thing they need is the actual sign in credentials before they get to the part about cracking said password. That was inadvertently supplied to them by MS because of the differing display message for an incorrect password opposed to an invalid login identification. I'd bet that because of changes inacted today by Microsoft that the number of actual hacks is going to be almost non existent. Therefore I think MS are the ones to blame more so than someone with a short pass phrase. Because MS already gave them half of the solution before they ever started trying to either hack the existing password or reset it by way of security questions. Doesn't the fact that they all of a suddenly changed the amount of unsuccessful login attempts (20 vs infinite) and the error message displayed for incorrect email / passphrase make it obvious the problem has more to do with them than it does with their consumers?
Reply
The first thing they need is the actual sign in credentials before they get to the part about cracking said password. That was inadvertently supplied to them by MS because of the differing display message for an incorrect password opposed to an invalid login identification. I'd bet that because of changes inacted today by Microsoft that the number of actual hacks is going to be almost non existent. Therefore I think MS are the ones to blame more so than someone with a short pass phrase. Because MS already gave them half of the solution before they ever started trying to either hack the existing password or reset it by way of security questions. Doesn't the fact that they all of a suddenly changed the amount of unsuccessful login attempts (20 vs infinite) and the error message displayed for incorrect email / passphrase make it obvious the problem has more to do with them than it does with their consumers?
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 3:57PM R Planteer said
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell
I'm not saying that MS's security was perfect-if you read what I typed, I said that the changes were for the better. Infinite logins is a bit much, although I think 5 is too low for the average user.
What I am saying is that if everyone had a decent password in the first place, it wouldn't matter. A good password is not feasible to brute force hack. Although MS's security measures clearly needed an improvment, the bottom line is that it was not a problem for anyone with a good, strong password.
The blame lies on both sides of the fence: People for having stupid passwords, and MS for not having adequate measures to prevent brute force attacks.
Reply
I'm not saying that MS's security was perfect-if you read what I typed, I said that the changes were for the better. Infinite logins is a bit much, although I think 5 is too low for the average user.
What I am saying is that if everyone had a decent password in the first place, it wouldn't matter. A good password is not feasible to brute force hack. Although MS's security measures clearly needed an improvment, the bottom line is that it was not a problem for anyone with a good, strong password.
The blame lies on both sides of the fence: People for having stupid passwords, and MS for not having adequate measures to prevent brute force attacks.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 4:22PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@R Planateer
Assuming the information we have now is accurate and true it could very well be a combination of inept passwords and equally inept security. I think the inept security is why people were targeted in the first place or we'd be seeing equal reports on psn and afaik that's not the case. So, this user base was targeted for a reason and assuming all the info we have is accurate it's because of how easy it is to get preliminary data on your target. I think another question that has to be asked is how these hackers knew which people specifically to target. So assuming you can get email addresses from the web that are tied to an XBL account how then do you know which accounts to target?
Another thing to consider is that MS is still denying there is even a problem with their WLID process. Their stance is still this is due to phising and social engeneering. I guess this recent security policy change was "coincidental."
Reply
Assuming the information we have now is accurate and true it could very well be a combination of inept passwords and equally inept security. I think the inept security is why people were targeted in the first place or we'd be seeing equal reports on psn and afaik that's not the case. So, this user base was targeted for a reason and assuming all the info we have is accurate it's because of how easy it is to get preliminary data on your target. I think another question that has to be asked is how these hackers knew which people specifically to target. So assuming you can get email addresses from the web that are tied to an XBL account how then do you know which accounts to target?
Another thing to consider is that MS is still denying there is even a problem with their WLID process. Their stance is still this is due to phising and social engeneering. I guess this recent security policy change was "coincidental."
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 8:09PM huffhuffhuff said
@eat it
Different school of thoughts on this topic. As long as users are sophisticated and they set their passwords accordingly to the typical enterprise policy, this type of authentication policy can make you easily target those who try to hack. Normaly people can easily put their password incorrectly 5 times in a row.
Reply
Different school of thoughts on this topic. As long as users are sophisticated and they set their passwords accordingly to the typical enterprise policy, this type of authentication policy can make you easily target those who try to hack. Normaly people can easily put their password incorrectly 5 times in a row.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 8:13PM BlazeKing said
@eat it
Here's what I would do:
Have Live users register an alternate e-mail on their account. This email isn't used for sign-in info at all. Alter the lock-out process by having the system reset the password to a random value after 5 tries. That reset password is sent to the alt e-mail on the account along with a notice of suspected account compromisation.
The hackers will be sent into a loop because they will never be able to guess the password and will have to start over every 5 times. Microsoft's way just slows them down.
Reply
Here's what I would do:
Have Live users register an alternate e-mail on their account. This email isn't used for sign-in info at all. Alter the lock-out process by having the system reset the password to a random value after 5 tries. That reset password is sent to the alt e-mail on the account along with a notice of suspected account compromisation.
The hackers will be sent into a loop because they will never be able to guess the password and will have to start over every 5 times. Microsoft's way just slows them down.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 2:28PM Dund3r said
@Roto13
It isn't as bad as expected. I contacted a customer services rep over a chat. They cancelled my XBL subscription so they could remove the linked credit card, then emailed me codes so I could get back all the time I had left on my XBL subscription. Took about a half hour and I even gained a few weeks of XBL out of the process. Definitely worth it for peace of mind.
Reply
It isn't as bad as expected. I contacted a customer services rep over a chat. They cancelled my XBL subscription so they could remove the linked credit card, then emailed me codes so I could get back all the time I had left on my XBL subscription. Took about a half hour and I even gained a few weeks of XBL out of the process. Definitely worth it for peace of mind.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 9:34AM jynxycat said
Microsoft notes that the exploit was not a loophole in Xbox.com, but a brute force attack that is an "industry-wide issue."
... yeah, maybe 15 years ago. Hotmail used to allow popmail requests from external sources with no lockout. Brute forcing those was a breeze -_-
Get with the times, Microsoft.
Reply
... yeah, maybe 15 years ago. Hotmail used to allow popmail requests from external sources with no lockout. Brute forcing those was a breeze -_-
Get with the times, Microsoft.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 10:42AM jsx92 said
They have tight security requirements for third-parties. It's not that they don't know what they're doing, it's that they can't be bothered.
Does WLID constantly break for non-Mac users? On a Mac/Safari I constantly get stuck in endless redirect loops trying to access xbox.com and I have to visit live.com just to sign in and make it stop. No surprise given that the WLID sign-in page has been the same since before 2005.
Point is, Microsoft knows how to make software, they just cut every possible corner doing it and only update it after it's been hacked to death (Windows, IE, and now WLID).
Reply
Does WLID constantly break for non-Mac users? On a Mac/Safari I constantly get stuck in endless redirect loops trying to access xbox.com and I have to visit live.com just to sign in and make it stop. No surprise given that the WLID sign-in page has been the same since before 2005.
Point is, Microsoft knows how to make software, they just cut every possible corner doing it and only update it after it's been hacked to death (Windows, IE, and now WLID).
Posted: Jan 18th 2012 1:14AM This Little Man Says His Name Is said
@jsx92
Your infinite redirect sounds more like a problem with Safari then xbox.com. I've had no problems logging in via IE/Firefox/Chrome on a Windows machine and no problem with Firefox on a Mac.
Reply
Your infinite redirect sounds more like a problem with Safari then xbox.com. I've had no problems logging in via IE/Firefox/Chrome on a Windows machine and no problem with Firefox on a Mac.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 9:42AM Negatron said
Its not just MS with issues. Hackers seem to be really trying this season.
On Google+ I innocently chatted about a specific MMO on a public timeline. Not thinking that far ahead, lets just say the email / account I used on G+ was the same as my MMO login. Not even an hour passed before I tried logging in and was locked out from (someone other than me) trying to log inti SWTOR.
Lets just say in my 30+ years I've been lucky on getting hacked and the like. G+? Deleted off all devices, and my trust of my internet brethren is gone :p *looks about room with shifty eyes*
Reply
On Google+ I innocently chatted about a specific MMO on a public timeline. Not thinking that far ahead, lets just say the email / account I used on G+ was the same as my MMO login. Not even an hour passed before I tried logging in and was locked out from (someone other than me) trying to log inti SWTOR.
Lets just say in my 30+ years I've been lucky on getting hacked and the like. G+? Deleted off all devices, and my trust of my internet brethren is gone :p *looks about room with shifty eyes*
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 9:55AM SokakuTakeda said
@Negatron I don't know you, but by reading your post I'd say that it's not that you've been lucky, it's that you've been smart. Most people don't care until something happens then it's someone elses fault. I can't recall the number of times I've consulted for a business and told them they needed to change their password policy only to have them flat out refuse even the most basic of basics.
Reply
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 10:20AM DarkNightRJ said
What would really help is if they didnt tell them if the windows live ID exists or not. You should know if your own ID exists.
Reply
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 11:05AM (Unverified) said
I like how everyone wants to blame Microsoft. You know how much companies love to lie about things then get caught later and pay a huge fine or even worse. Everything I have heard from Microsoft so far makes complete sense. I believe most people have poor passwords. I'm not going to take peoples complaints on message boards as proof of anything else.
Reply
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 11:26AM DMS0205 said
@(Unverified) It is a mix of both Microsoft and weak passwords. But bottom line is Microsoft is hiding the fact there was an issue. Even on their statement they said there was no loophole on xbox.com. Yes, there was a loophole on xbox.com. They were correct in saying that live was not hacked but they still need to own up as see that there was an issue.
Reply
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 1:24PM (Unverified) said
@Roto13
I'm saying a lot of Xbox owners are idiots. Have you been on Live lately? I just hope a lot of these people are the hate spewing ignorants on Live who are losing their money.
Reply
I'm saying a lot of Xbox owners are idiots. Have you been on Live lately? I just hope a lot of these people are the hate spewing ignorants on Live who are losing their money.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 2:06PM gravemistake said
@Roto13
Except for the fact that it is. It happens to Steam users, Google users, Twitter users and Apple iTunes users all the time... you just don't hear about that because it's not the cool thing to report on right now.
The moment that an article on a popular site is written about a company like Apple where users accounts are being hacked I am sure you will see the same type of thing... everyone posting about how it happened to them (over the past few years) and how horrible the company is because their account was hacked and it must be the companies fault for the hack... etc.
I think the likely culprit are those lists of email addresses/usernames and passwords out there in the wild. Plug in an email address/username to a popular service and see if you can gain access to the account using the corresponding password.
Reply
Except for the fact that it is. It happens to Steam users, Google users, Twitter users and Apple iTunes users all the time... you just don't hear about that because it's not the cool thing to report on right now.
The moment that an article on a popular site is written about a company like Apple where users accounts are being hacked I am sure you will see the same type of thing... everyone posting about how it happened to them (over the past few years) and how horrible the company is because their account was hacked and it must be the companies fault for the hack... etc.
I think the likely culprit are those lists of email addresses/usernames and passwords out there in the wild. Plug in an email address/username to a popular service and see if you can gain access to the account using the corresponding password.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 4:02PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
@gravemistake
The difference is the series of XBL account hacks happened all at once around the same time frame. We aren't talking about a handful of peoples accounts being compromised. This was a massive exploit in the WLID security protocols. Theft or account phishing is always a possibility and always will be but comparing random & isolated occurrences and this FIFA / XBL / WLID breach goes far beyond random people being targeted.
It sounds like you are saying this is a hit piece on MS because it's happening to everyone else. I'd say that opinion is missing the bigger picture of how widespread it's become. Lots of affected users telling similar stories at the same time. Many of whom claim to have had secure randomized passwords.
This story has some legs. Don't expect it'll go away any time soon. I think peoples frustrations are just as much with MS as they are with being hacked because they are basically being called unaware morons who were preyed upon because of their stupidity and lack of caution with respect to their online accounts.
Reply
The difference is the series of XBL account hacks happened all at once around the same time frame. We aren't talking about a handful of peoples accounts being compromised. This was a massive exploit in the WLID security protocols. Theft or account phishing is always a possibility and always will be but comparing random & isolated occurrences and this FIFA / XBL / WLID breach goes far beyond random people being targeted.
It sounds like you are saying this is a hit piece on MS because it's happening to everyone else. I'd say that opinion is missing the bigger picture of how widespread it's become. Lots of affected users telling similar stories at the same time. Many of whom claim to have had secure randomized passwords.
This story has some legs. Don't expect it'll go away any time soon. I think peoples frustrations are just as much with MS as they are with being hacked because they are basically being called unaware morons who were preyed upon because of their stupidity and lack of caution with respect to their online accounts.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 11:13AM (Unverified) said
Wish they would have implemented this like 5 days ago, before I got hacked...
Reply
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 12:18PM Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell said
"Microsoft notes that the exploit was not a loophole in Xbox.com, but a brute force attack that is an "industry-wide issue.""
Industry wide issue? Shouldn't they elaborate on the specifics of that assertion? It'd also seem wise to publicly announce the changes in the windows live id sign in process. It sounds like they don't want to take any responsibility for these attacks even though they are obviously to blame. By not specifically addressing the issue they are setting themselves up for a possible cataclysmic public relations nightmare. This blame the consumer and industry mentality is eerily similar to the initial reporting of the rrod issue.
Reply
Industry wide issue? Shouldn't they elaborate on the specifics of that assertion? It'd also seem wise to publicly announce the changes in the windows live id sign in process. It sounds like they don't want to take any responsibility for these attacks even though they are obviously to blame. By not specifically addressing the issue they are setting themselves up for a possible cataclysmic public relations nightmare. This blame the consumer and industry mentality is eerily similar to the initial reporting of the rrod issue.
Posted: Jan 18th 2012 1:39AM maveric101 said
@Johnnynumber5 is powered by cell
"setting themselves up for a possible cataclysmic public relations nightmare"
you'd like that, wouldn't you? you've always been a huge Sony fanboy, and i know you'd like to prove that MS is just as vulnerable.
the bottom line is that this WAS a security flaw in MS's sign-in process, but one that is exceedingly easy to fix, unlike Sony's multitude of egregious security flaws. By keeping the public exposure to this incident at a minimum, nobody but the tech nerds will find out. Xbox Live will not be shut down for a month; nobody will give a shit. there will be no brouhaha, and MS will continue on. right or wrong, that's how it's gonna go. deal with it.
Reply
"setting themselves up for a possible cataclysmic public relations nightmare"
you'd like that, wouldn't you? you've always been a huge Sony fanboy, and i know you'd like to prove that MS is just as vulnerable.
the bottom line is that this WAS a security flaw in MS's sign-in process, but one that is exceedingly easy to fix, unlike Sony's multitude of egregious security flaws. By keeping the public exposure to this incident at a minimum, nobody but the tech nerds will find out. Xbox Live will not be shut down for a month; nobody will give a shit. there will be no brouhaha, and MS will continue on. right or wrong, that's how it's gonna go. deal with it.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 12:47PM TC said
Phew, just in time for me to hand my code to Microsoft's PR:
10 IF complaint IS MORE THAN serious THEN GOTO 40
20 IGNORE complaint
30 END
40 IF complaint IS LESS THAN litigious THEN GOTO 80
50 PRINT 'WE HAVE HAD A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF complaint, HOWEVER complaint IS OUR NUMBER ONE PRIORITY AND SOMETHING MICROSOFT TAKES VERY SERIOUSLY, WE WILL ASPIRE TO RESOLVE THIS TO EVERYONES COMPLETE SATISFACTION'
60 RUN fix
70 END
80 PRINT 'I CAN STATE WE HAVE HAD NO ISSUE WITH complaint, MICROSOFT CONTINUOUSLY AUDITS ITS SYSTEMS TO AVOID ISSUES OF complaint.'
90 GOTO 20
Reply
10 IF complaint IS MORE THAN serious THEN GOTO 40
20 IGNORE complaint
30 END
40 IF complaint IS LESS THAN litigious THEN GOTO 80
50 PRINT 'WE HAVE HAD A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF complaint, HOWEVER complaint IS OUR NUMBER ONE PRIORITY AND SOMETHING MICROSOFT TAKES VERY SERIOUSLY, WE WILL ASPIRE TO RESOLVE THIS TO EVERYONES COMPLETE SATISFACTION'
60 RUN fix
70 END
80 PRINT 'I CAN STATE WE HAVE HAD NO ISSUE WITH complaint, MICROSOFT CONTINUOUSLY AUDITS ITS SYSTEMS TO AVOID ISSUES OF complaint.'
90 GOTO 20
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 1:07PM baby sea tuna said
@TC
I don't speak nerd, but I'll go ahead and assume that was funny enough to warrant the double posting. Maybe you can fix Joystiq's comment system while you're at it.
Reply
I don't speak nerd, but I'll go ahead and assume that was funny enough to warrant the double posting. Maybe you can fix Joystiq's comment system while you're at it.
Posted: Jan 17th 2012 12:53PM TC said
Phew, just in time for me to hand my code to Microsoft's PR:
10 IF complaint IS MORE THAN serious THEN GOTO 40
20 IGNORE complaint
30 END
40 IF complaint IS LESS THAN litigious THEN GOTO 80
50 PRINT 'WE HAVE HAD A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF complaint, HOWEVER complaint IS OUR NUMBER ONE PRIORITY AND SOMETHING MICROSOFT TAKES VERY SERIOUSLY, WE WILL ASPIRE TO RESOLVE THIS TO EVERYONES COMPLETE SATISFACTION'
60 RUN fix
70 END
80 PRINT 'I CAN STATE WE HAVE HAD NO ISSUE WITH complaint, MICROSOFT CONTINUOUSLY AUDITS ITS SYSTEMS TO AVOID ISSUES OF complaint.'
90 GOTO 20
Reply
10 IF complaint IS MORE THAN serious THEN GOTO 40
20 IGNORE complaint
30 END
40 IF complaint IS LESS THAN litigious THEN GOTO 80
50 PRINT 'WE HAVE HAD A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF complaint, HOWEVER complaint IS OUR NUMBER ONE PRIORITY AND SOMETHING MICROSOFT TAKES VERY SERIOUSLY, WE WILL ASPIRE TO RESOLVE THIS TO EVERYONES COMPLETE SATISFACTION'
60 RUN fix
70 END
80 PRINT 'I CAN STATE WE HAVE HAD NO ISSUE WITH complaint, MICROSOFT CONTINUOUSLY AUDITS ITS SYSTEMS TO AVOID ISSUES OF complaint.'
90 GOTO 20
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
Persona 3, Tactics Ogre, and other PSP RPGs that will live on my Vita
Posted on Feb 22nd 2012 5:45PM
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- Rumor: Japanese Vita devs jumping ship, Sony responds 124 comments
- Buy 2 get 1 free on select Vita games at GameStop starting today 114 comments
- Sony's Rohde: proprietary Vita cards 'completely necessary' to combat piracy 112 comments
- Sony: Call of Duty blasting onto Vita this fall 89 comments
- Asura's Wrath review: Wrecking the curve 84 comments










