
The Inquirer has published a speculative article supposedly based on news from Games Developers Conference Europe that suggests Sony will have to pay $100 per Blu-Ray drive in each PS3. No, wait, more than $100 per console. And that number comes from an article that states;
"Microsoft is playing a safe game here, it will launch with DVD+RW but in some point in the future might release a new Xbox 360 version with HD-DVD or a Blu Ray drive."
Uh, since when is Microsoft putting DVD+/-RW drives in the Xbox 360?
Last time we checked it's just a standard 16x DVD drive, which can't be costing Microsoft any more than $5-10 a
unit, if you adjust for the huge number they've ordered.
Sure, it's a given that the Blu-Ray drive will be expensive, but more than $100 after economies of scale are factored
in? That'd make it possibly the single most expensive component in the PS3 bar the Cell chip. As it stands, the article
makes incorrect statements about the rival console's optical drive and fails to back up the statement with a source.
We're getting in touch with The Inquirer to see where exactly they pulled that number from. Stay tuned for more.
[Thanks, bandersnatch]
[Update: Dan of gamegeeknews.com gave us the low down on the original source. In June a Merril Lynch analyst from Japan estimated the costs of the components at $100 each for the Cell, RSX CPU and Blu-Ray. We've got no idea why The Inquirer felt the need to write up this 3 month old report as news, or why they stated the 360 will have a DVD burner.]


















(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
It's all old news, and I have no idea why it's suddenly deemed "news" all over again.
Reply
Keep in mind that the PS3 will be the effective reference platform for Blu-ray players. Compare that to the PS2, which shipped years after that original $1,000 Sony DVD player which served as the reference platofrm for DVD in its era. Sony is trying to establish two major standards in one product. Cost issues are just one piece of the challenge.
Reply
it maybe a somewhat smart move for microsot since they are still not turnning a profit in their entertainment side of buisness. but god damn they are chargeing 400 bucks for a $15 20 gig hard drive and a $5 dvd player... rape rape!!!
Reply
oh wait, i mean its a decent site that has internet rumours with no concrete sources ever...
everything is just speculation...
ok, sony owns blue-ray, sony owns cell... you think they are gonna be spending this much on stuff they created themselves and own patents to?
all these numbers are just speculations on what the market cost will be for the amounts...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
back when ps2 launch in 2000... it was $299 USD...
people were ready to payout that much in 2000... due to changes in economy and other bs.. $299 isnt what it use to be...
i for one was one of the fools who bought it on launch date...
and i am dumb enough to do it again... =p
over inflation and stuff.. 299 isnt worth what 299 was 5 years ago... i am willing to spend 100 to maybe even 200 more than that...
Reply
I don't think many kids will own that one.
I can't wait to buy one.
$1K is my limit though.
Reply
Reply
Reply
people were ready to payout that much in 2000... due to changes in economy and other bs.. $299 isnt what it use to be..."
Well, the PS2 was launched in the middle of the Dot Com boom, before the AOL/Time Warner merge.
Everyone had jobs, everyone was making money hand over fist, and everyone had hundreds of thousands of new dollars thanks to the stock market.
Right now the economy is down, unemployment is up, all those stocks are from companies now bankrupt, we're in the middle of a war, and tens of thousands are now homeless.
It's a much worse economy to launch a luxury item in. Especially a very expensive one, relatively.
Reply
Gee, there are people willing to spend $250+ on the PSP.
Some people are willing to spend even more on iPod gear.
Right now, HDTV sets that cost $2000+ are flying off the shelves at Costco, BestBuy, Circuit City, etc.
There is no doubt the PS3 will sell.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply