BruceLeroy

No they're not.

Because PS3's do not overheat and break down.

7. It affected Shadowrun's score, and playstation fans cheered. Now it may affect Warhawk, and suddenly EGM "has lost it's edge" and "is treating this game unfairly". It's either a standard to rate a game lower if the cost is a factor in justifying the score (for example, should live arcade and budget PSN games be held to a different rating scale than full-blown PS3 and 360 titles), or none at all. Pick one, and stick with it, but don't trash an offering from the other side to then turn around and complain when the same stuff happens to something on a console YOU love.

Posted at 7:47PM on Aug 2nd 2007 by Space_Butler

Dude....STFU...why don't you say that to all the 360 fantards that were crying foul when Shadowrun got reviewed badly because of price? You're just another typical 360 moron.

So what are you saying JonnyBoy? That the dragons look like cute furry little creatures with bit eyes? You're just a pathetic stupid fantard. Get a life you moron.

When did they mention it would only run at 720p? I would trust Epic would have the skills to push it to 1080p. They did mention they were going to optimize the Unreal engine to run on the PS3. And I'm hoping they pull it off. That would be sweet on my 50".

Both are still rip-offs.

Mark Mifsud
Jul 13th 2007
1:49PM

20Gb don't cost $100 (not even with the high dollar inflation)


Apparently to MS it does. Remember all those Core owners that had to buy the 20GB HD for $100. At least before MS came out with the even more overpriced 120GB for $180?