xxxstylzxxx

So did I.

And here I'm thinking that Joystiq.com is a reliable and credible source of gaming info. Boy was I wrong. Has anyone bothered to read what was quoted by Bungie in the article at all before commenting? And if so how could anyone with an ounce of reading comprehension totally misinterpret what was being said? Has anyone checked out Jeremy Parish's latest blog on 1up.com? I guess not. Because if you did you'd realize that not only is the headline for this particular blog misleading, it's downright irresponsible journalism if you even wanna call it that.

Bungie has in no way officially confirmed nor denied online co-op for Halo 3. According to the article and Jeremy himself (one of the editors of the article in question)Bungie wants it and knows that we all want it and they're doing everything in their power to make it happen by launch. And even if it doesn't work out that way they will be more than willing to make it available via DLC. They also explain why a game the likes of Halo 3 is much more difficult to program in terms of incoporating online co-op than say games like Gears of War or Crackdown. Any person remotely knowledgable of video games should know this. So please ,before you all break out your Frankie voodoo dolls, read the article and then read it again if you have to, along with Jeremy's blog. Also keep in mind that this particular interview took place approxiametly a month ago so it is possible that by the time the issue is published next month Bungie may have already figured out a way to make it work. Unbelievable.