I think thinner is definitely better, for all kinds of reasons, even if the unmentioned tech specs don't turn out to be quite as good as it's "chubbier" competition. I mean, 4,000:1, 2ms? Jesus. Do people really notice the difference between that and, say, 3,000:1 and 6ms? I'm guessing that, just like for mp3's, the average user probably does not, so even there that's damn good enough.
I suspect that thinner will be more sustainable, both in terms of materials and power, as well as more practical on one's desktop.
Absolutely nothing replaces a good diet (i.e., a diet you can feel comfortable eating for the rest of your life) and regular exercise. Nothing. Procedures like these may be useful for those whose weight problems are associated with conditions beyond their control, however.
BenQ's V2400W claims to be world's thinnest, stealthiest 24-inch LCD monitor
Mar 17th 2008 6:39AM (Engadget)I suspect that thinner will be more sustainable, both in terms of materials and power, as well as more practical on one's desktop.
Joyswag: Win this $5K dollar gaming rig from Falcon Northwest
Nov 26th 2007 2:23AM (Joystiq)Black Friday Giveaways (part 18): Neuros OSD + 160GB drive
Nov 24th 2007 11:22PM (Engadget)Black Friday Giveaways (part 19): Wii + Metroid Prime 3 and more
Nov 24th 2007 11:20PM (Engadget)Massively's Massive Giveaways - Win a 24" Samsung LCD Monitor! [Updated]
Nov 17th 2007 5:43AM (Massively)Massively's Massive Giveaways: Guild Wars part 6
Nov 9th 2007 10:10PM (Massively)Satiety's transoral TOGa stomach stapling procedure
Jul 23rd 2007 7:23AM (Engadget)