King3567

Are you guys kidding me? Call of Duty 4 was perhaps the most overrated game of 2007. It's campaign was too short and too easy (I beat Veteran in 3 days!) and was far inferior to Call of Duty 2's. It's multiplayer was grossly unbalanced (try beating a level 40 or so when your first start out) and I feel was inferior to 3's almost Battlefield-like multiplayer.

Call of Duty 4 isn't as great as you all say it was. Don't get me wrong, I still liked it, I just think that because it wasn't World War II, some of you praise it so highly. But, to be honest, the series always felt best as World War II and if the Call of Duty 6 rumor is true, I think I might be done with the series.

I love how this game has half-decent graphics and the fanboys are claiming this will be a good game because of that. This game looks generic as all hell. I'll reaserve final judgement until more information/vids are released, but as of now this looks pathetic.

If he doesn't work for Microsoft, he will be one of the biggest hypocrites ever.

But anyway, I agree in that I actually feel sorry for him.

I said REAL DLC for a reason. Having a ton of shit stages be automatically downloaded to your Wii for a day does not count. Don't tell me that I can download user created stages featured on WiiFanboy or anywhere else because I don't have an SD card and even if I did, it is far too much of a hassle to even be worth it.

To be honest, I just clicked on this to see what Fernando's response was ;). But seriously, I own a Wii and the storage is a joke. Whether they have DLC isn't the problem (even though they don't), it's that there is no way that the DLC can even fit on the Wii's storage system. Color me skeptical that they will ever release a solution because I can't imagine Nintendo's current audience ever wanting or needing it.

Believe me though, I am hoping that they do so they can get some REAL DLC for Smash Bros.

I go to Circuit City or Best Buy to get my games. I refuse to go to Gamestop unless there is an extraordinary pre-order offer like Tales of Symphonia.

The thing is, with this and Aerosmith, why do they sell them at full price? Activision even admits that they are just barely expansions so why not charge $40 dollars or so for the disk or even yet, just make a truckload of DLC. If you have read the Game Informer article on Guitar Hero 4, they mention that they want to do alot better with DLC this time. Well, why screw yourself out of some of the best DLC opportunity?

Nonetheless, I must admit this sounds quite tempting but then again over half of Metallica's catalog is utter shit. Make Guitar Hero:Led Zeppelin now. That I would buy in a heartbeat.

Wow, such idiocy Fernando and Wii60 Warrior. I applaud EGM and 1UP for actually, I don't know, giving out fair, unbiased reviews. I don't go to IGN anymore for videogame reviews ever since the whole, "EXCLUSIVE REVIEW!" debacle.

A review is an opinion that SHOULDN'T be changed or exclusive.

This date is probably true. November has way too many games coming out for me, namely Left 4 Dead.

...Well, I am getting this game and I have Rock Band. You people really need to lighten up a little bit. Was Guitar Hero III as good as the others or Rock Band? No, but it was still enjoyable. Rock Band was and is amazing to play even, what, six months after launch? I am getting this because the drums look better, I like the new freedom in the multiple career modes, I like how I can create my own song, and I like how everything is wireless. Not many people have talked about any of these things and mostly just say, "LAWL @ GH, RB WUZ BETTR!!!!" Wait until you play to make judgments on the actual gameplay.

They are both good (except Guitar Hero III)and since I can afford both, I will do so.