Tristan King

You couldn't find a better picture/pun than spacejam vs space junk?

It's a frikkin' laser beam??

@TimStevens

Thanks :P

@TimStevens

And yet you have tagged links to both the iPhone and iPad Scabble.

Why doesn't Android get a tag in the same article?

Yeah, sure.

Honestly engadget, How much revenue do you make every time you mention the iPhone?

This article has nothing to do with the iPhone! Why even mention it?

@tad604

Dont get me wrong, I think the tech would be amazing, I'm just trying to correct a mathematical mis-comprehension (even though my source was unfortunately inaccurate)

Any power saving with these devices would be amazing, in Australia we get blackouts during the summer because of the AC.

@juanvaldez

Nothing to do with upstaging, just trying to correct.

Anyway, I was going off how engadget wrote the article, 2 mistakes in one article is pretty impressive. I didn't think I would need to check the source to see if engadget was correct. My statement holds for the information I had.

Cheers.

@DTJ

90% more efficient != 90% less energy

If it were 100% more efficient it would use half the energy. 90% more efficient means it is using about 53% of the power.

Try not to use shampoo maths. :P

@mynk

I'm glad I wasn't the only one to notice engadget's clear lack of basic climate science. Lol @ poor research there big e

I'll correct myself before anyone else does, but the required decibel drop to achieve half the perceived volume is over 10dB, so a drop of between 5-8 on a logarithmic scale would equate to ~ 3/4 volume.

@Ruben

Nope, check above