Jeff

#17 I'm pretty tired of the notion that if it's a first person shooter in HAS to have multiplayer. Tagged on, half assed multiplayer is NOT what I want. It's obvious the developer concentrated on the campaign. Can a developer not make a game these days that THEY want to make? Besides if they did add ultiplayer and it sucked then people would just bitch about the multiplayer sucks and then it WOULD get a lower score. What happened to amazing single player campaigns LIKE Zelda:OOT. The only FPS that need multiplayer are war games...

#15. Zelda:OOT had bad control?? Don't know what game you played. The control was always something mentioned in reviews as to one of the reasons it WAS perfect. If any game in history deserves a 100 it's that one. Look, I'm sure in every game that someone reviews as perfect you can find one bad texture or SOMETHING to nit pick to bring it down. But to me, nit picking doesn't count.

Umm Paul? "It's only a matter of time before someone 'markets' on 9/11"? First off you grammer is horrendoes, so you are either 10 years old or a complete and total dumbass. Second, Ever heard of a few little films by the names of "World Trade Center" or "United 93"? Very good films, sure, but they made money off of the 9/11 name. Better exmaple and more fitting is the simple fact that assholes sold pieces of the rubble from ground zero on ebay. Trust me, people have been making money off of those events for the past 6 years. You my friend are a sick person. Wether you meant to come off that way or not doesnt matter. It wouldnt be "revolutionary" or "groundbreaking" at all. It would be morbid, disrespectful and downright sinister. Bungie would lose al respect and there would be protests out the ass. Would peopkle still buy the game? Probably. But Bungie would go down in history as the biggest dousche bags in the industry. You my friend are a complete retard. Go jump off a bridge.

Well I am addicted as hell to Lumines. I love it. This isn't your average Arcade game. It's a full blown game, always was a full blown game. It cost 40.00 bucks for the Psp. Why did everyone think we'd get it cheaper? Because it's been out for a year? What about GTA:SA for xbox? It came out and almost the same price it did for PS2. Same with other ports. We all knew that retail sized games would be coming to Arcade, not just classics from the 80's and 90's. Those SHOULD be 5-10 bucks. Not Lumines or other original properties. Get over it. You dont like it, don't buy it.

Number 12, you're getting the tv shows, movies, I doubt. The bigger HD is coming to. I just hope theres a way to tranfer my stuff from my old HD to the new bigger one. Otherwise, switching HD's all the damn time is gonna be a pain in the ASS

#7. What do you mean you can't copy the stuff from your memory card to perfect dark? I've never tried but I'm guessing you're saying that there's no way to do so. That sucks. I'll still be getting the 256 because 64 is small as crap and 256 can fit A LOT more stuff. I mean videos mostly are what I'm talking about.

Also, I've heard that the camera is great quality. The framerate is smooth and it's just a really good product. I mean dont let the price throw you off. Look at the 360 itself. 300-400 dollars is cheap considering that if you want to get the same graphics for a computer you're paying a lot more than the 360.

dood IV is 4 not 3. V is 5 and I is 1. You subtract them when the lower comes first.. It's GTA 4 because they are on number 4. 1 ans 2 were on PC. GTA 3 was on PS2 and GTA Vice City and San Andreas weren't true sequals. They were more like GTA 3 with just more stuff in it. GTA 3 was a true step forward in the series, just like 4 will be.

Most certainly is gameplay dumbass. You can tell. Looks amazing. Wish it was 360 exclusive, but of course it aint.

Revolution 4 Ever. If you're not buying a Wii, but you were buying it when it was called Revolution, that means that you were buying it cuz it "had a cool name"? That's a pretty retarted thing to do. The FEATURES of he system havent changed, just the name. It's not like calling it Wii takes away things it can do. It still does and will do the same things they said it would when they called Revolution. So b/c they changed the name to Wii you dont want one now?

If you guys are embarrased to buy something because of a friggin name it has, I feel sorry for you. Anyone who aint buying one b/c of the name change, but was before, are all SELLOUTS. You all dont deserve one anyways...

All I know, is I am not a fanboy. I have never visited any type of nintendo only message board or anything like that. I've owned all nintendo systems, yes, but I had Xbox Live the day it was released (got my xbox about 7 months after release b/c I didnt know much about it) and I have been on live basically every night. I am a Nintendo/Microsoft fanboy. I love both. However, I do feel as if Nintendo is more creative and original.

Sony just SUCKS. I hate the playstation 2, will hate the ps3, the Ps2's are pieces of shit. I worked at Eb for a year and we would have on average 3 busted ps2's come into the store a day. I have never seen a busted Nintendo and only rarely have I seen a busted Xbox. Sony Sucks.