V1L3

If they release PSO Ep. 1 & 2 with no fee to play online, I will NEVER PLAY ANOTHER GAME FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.

Nah, just kidding.

I would totally pay.

I'd let you watch. I would invite you
But the queens WE use would not excite you.

...Oh.

So after giving Sony all your money, you're going to sell everything at a loss?

You sure showed them.

His...name...is...Aeo...fel.

Caesar should have used that argument when the Romans were throwing Christians to the lions at the Colloseum.

"Really, the only people who are against this are the Christians..."

"Watch Me Play Sonic Riders"

They should make this mandatory.

I'd be far more likely to donate money if it meant not having to watch someone play Sonic Riders.

That was more than 2 reasons.

The Wii was successful, not for it's motion control, but for it's design, marketing and "now everyone can play!" message.

I prefer the PS3 to the 360, but I can say without reservation that Natal is the only device that has the potential to out-Wii the Wii, for 2 reasons.

A) Controller - Simple (remote) controller - no controller. It's the natural progression to rope in non-gamers.

B) It's new (the Sony motion controller is just the next step-up from the Wii remote).

C) It will probably be packed in with a new (looking) piece of hardware, which avoids the "But it's an add-on!" complaint. More so, Microsoft could package the whole thing together far more affordably than Sony could a PS3 + PS Eye + Motion Controller, and require no extra controllers.

It's just really hard to see what else Nintendo (or Sony) could innovate from here on out, until we start heading into "mind control" or "hologram" territory.

Why are people talking about online play?

This sounds like it'd be strictly for downloading games, not playing them.

What good does it do if the ESRB "accepts that games can be for adults," when an AO rating on anything other than a PC game makes that game unavailable for release in the United States?