Sych

That kind of letter-swapping is known as a Spoonerism

do want!

Also, Charlie's comment is another freaking internet forum disease symptom. "Let's All Be The Good Guy!", also known as, "Moral Highground - Must Have!". I mean how exactly does abusive language in any way actually alter the facts of the argument? I'd love to know, sounds like something you could really put to use.

I don't think Tony invalidated anything at all. Some people get so shocked when they're condescended to, after having been condescending themselves. Referring to his arguement as being 'made up', and by 'forum whiners' is pretty condescending, and on top of that it basically tries to sweep aside what Tony said by debunking it without any kind of justification.

So really, the insults were being asked for. And you know the old adage, "ask, and ye shall receive".

Also, wheras Elarius post was just annoying, Tony's had some info, and seeing someone who actually meters out abuse where it's due is always bonus points.

I'd wait and see first. But at the very least, it shouldn't be *as* infuriating for attackers as it has the possibility to be right now, when a rogue can get lucky and have it save them three times in a row, in which time they will have a pretty reasonable chance of killing their aggressor.

Less random, really. I'm massively unsure about three seconds of invincibility though. Maybe 2 seconds, but 3 seconds of total invuln? A bit scary.