Dixie_Flatline

Timothy Shepard. It's my name, and I am dumb like that.

This game rules. Definitely count me in.

I would build a level based on Ozymandias' Antarctic fortress from Watchmen. I would dress Sackboy as a little Rorschach and have him fight white tigers and robots, only to make it all the way to the end and be blown to a whirl of atoms by a giant blue Dr. Manhattan. A second player could be Nite Owl, of course. When Rorschachboy dies, he could make that adorable scared face.

That would be fun.

What is the point of a ratings system if all you are going to do is rescind your rating without cause? This kind of reactionary, purposeless behavior isn't going to do much to inspire confidence in an already-under-the-microscope ratings entity. I certainly think that games should be re-rated if there is undisclosed content, but if the ESRB approved the game with the content listed and they are concerned about another third party mod that actually inserts new art into the game to allow for nude character models, then they are going too far. There is no way that Bethesda should be held responsible for that kind of behavior. Rockstar's error was leaving the content there, Bethesda's was apparently respecting the community enough to leave it open to do so if you wished.

This whole thing is just a big mess, and it stinks that a stand-up dev like Bethesda is suffering for someone else's mistake.