B33

"I love you Nintendo for making gaming affordableand not like all these life sucking Vampires
(Micro$oft & $ony)"

All games are $50. Microsoft and Sony games are $50-$60. $10 doesn't make that much of a difference.


Lackluster accessories. Nothing like spewing out junk we don't need. And nice steal from Kotaku. Seems like that's all Joystiq does these days...

You still need the hard drive regardless...

"A $600 dollar system without rumble! Go buy a damn 360 you idiots. 360 has the same games (MOST BETTER) and cost less. Fools!

This generation the 360 is the way to go. Im not bias against any console. I like getting the most for my money. Don't be stupid! Buy a 360 or Wii."

If you buy a console just for rumble then you deserve to be smacked across the face with your console. It's that weak.

No, if you were smart and compared the PS3's exclusives with the 360s, you'd realize who has the better games.

Not bias? You just sat there and stated the basic words that came from Peter Moores mouth. Learn to make decisions for yourself. The only reason you shout "Wii60" is because Moore said it. Use your brain, and stop listening to just what a moron that gets a new tattoo to hype a game says.

In the end, your just another fool who listens too much to a lot of the lies and bad press put out. The PS3 is $500-$600. You don't need the $600 version and the differences are so slim, I doubt Sony will even put the $600 out(at this rate).

400,000 is 60,000 units more then what the 360 put out at launch. And the 360 had delays in Europe too. Why is that everyone gives Sony a hard time? Yet says that Nintendo and Microsoft can do no wrong? Get over your inner fanboy.

"Rumble is a feature that has been on EVERY current gen console and every next gen console EXCEPT the PS3. I would call that crippled *and* a step backwards into the early '90's."

And the Wii and PS3 have motion sensing technology, yet the 360 is lacking it. Not that it matters, since I really think motion sensing technology is a gimick... When it comes to deciding which one I'd rather have, it'd just be rumble... Or both.

"Beta-ray anyone?"

Look another unintelligent blu-ray hater that is just made because he has to pay extra cash for a disc format that blows the 360 and Wiis dvd format. Sony is pushing Blu-Ray for games. Not movies. If it fails in the movie department, Sony will still use it for games. Stop whining and think before you shoot out a lame and overly used joke.

It's all bluff. There's no way Nintendo will have 9 million units out by the end of 2006. Don't let Joystiqs bias and Nintendos bluff fool you.

"Rumble is great and deep down you know it. The PS3 is a crippled console."

Rumble is alright. It's not necessary for gameplay though. And no rumble doesn't cripple the PS3 at all.

Can't view the video because the latest version of firefox is a piece of crap.

16 seconds is about the time it takes for a 360 to load... And it's unfinished software. There is still some kinks to fix.

Thanks Joystiq, for yet another old news topic and a biased report. The Xbox 360 interface isn't that more complex or fancy either. And why does it matter how the interface is?