chasing

They're plentiful in Austin.

The book had a sequel, so why shouldn't the movie. You don't have to see it if you don't want to - no one's going to force you.

They're hardly "uber-pricey", Australia isn't being "high and mighty", and being a Kyoto signatory doesn't mean much when signing countries aren't meeting targets.

What's so confusing about that chart? It's crystal clear. HD-DVD had a sizable lead, is still in the lead (if slightly), but is quickly losing it to Blu-Ray, who, at the current rate, will soon surpass HD-DVD and leave it in the dust.

As for which is 'superior' - what? They both hold data, the same data, and it's only by volume of data held that Blu-Ray looks to have the eventual edge. But so what? There are other issues at play - compatibility, cost, etc. And as for the present time, they both hold all the HD content I need on a single disc.

Professional courtesy would dictate you offer Webb at least a little slack - I mean, certainly you realize plenty of your readers also watch her. So why crap where you eat? It's tacky (and not so smart).

I wish you'd learn what 'literally' means, and then stop using it. Just sayin'.

And as far as Xbox3 goes - well, what did people expect, that MS was going to pay all those engineers to go drink margaritas for the next few years? Of course they're putting them to work.

Just one

nope no card

HD-DVD

Gears of War