Christopher Jon Mangano

Star Wars games = crap. Plain and simple.

Nope. Read the article. He made them, but used artwork from the time to do it. There was no Star Wars graphic adventure from Lucasarts so there was no original box art work to resize, remaster, ect..

If it were a new adventure game I'd be interested in it.

Should this really bother anyone? I think in previous generation it made sense as technology was still rapidly expanding on all fronts but things have really slowed down since then. Besides often the first 2 years of the sytem are hardly the greatest so just when developers start to hit thier stride the system is axed for the next one. Considering the investment it would seem much smarter not only from bussniess perspective but for better for everyone if the system lifecycle was increased to 8 or even 0 years. They might also want to start making them somewhat more upgradable. Why throw out a system that is perfectly good when all it may need is a graphic upgrade for instance. It can be done in a way that is fart more user freindly than what is done on computer, not like that is hard, but to some it is.

RA universe is by far the best and the most popular too. I am happy to hear this but yeah I am a little cautious on it too. C&C 3 was ok but I am just not sure a classic RTS style game is going to satisfy too many people these days and that was the biggest problem I had with C&C 3 especially with games like Company of Heroes which have advanced the genre to new levels. It might work better for consoles than PC gamers since many console gamers know little about the genre.
I feel the same way about Starcraft 2 btw as well. I ge the impression right now that game will be very much a classic RTS and unfortunately will still sell lots copies despite it being inferior to some of the new stuff.