Maybe the half of the workers that always seem to be standing around doing nothing on Caltrans jobs could hold shields to protect those actually doing the work?
Less than a week ago I was watching a pledge drive on PBS where they said only 7% of their total budget came from "the government" and 50% was viewer donations. Obviously, their point was how important viewer support is.
Now, assuming this person wasn't lying, that means a 25% cut in government funding would mean less than a 2% cut in their total budget.
Given there is no reason for any tax payer funding of PBS anything they get should be pure gravy. A reduction of this amount shouldn't have much of an impact on programming. They need to learn to operate on their on revenue.
So would people that are just roommates be covered? Because it sounds like at Brad's workplace they would be. The term 'domestic patner" just seems too vague to base a policy on but I guess that would depend how a individual company defines it.
Just to be clear I have no problem with companys offering such benefits.
Well I am little late to this party but I thought I would throw my 2 cents in...
The problem I have with pulling the review is this, if the review had gone the other way, overly praising the game because the reviewer loved the genre, it would not have been pulled.
The review was what it was. Let people read it and judge it for themselves. If they were that concerned about it they could have sought out a reviewer that loved the genre and had him/her post their viewpoint.
"I remember before the last election, California stations didn't show any Schwartzenegger films because of those FCC regulations."
Completely false. The equal time laws do not apply in such a case. Stations that didn't show any of his movies during that time were just being overly cautious.
Also, the equal time rules, as written, clearly do not apply to the Tonight Show. "The rules do not apply to news programs, interview shows and documentaries in which the candidate is not the sole focus."
Schwarzenegger, because of his movie career, has some interest to a national audience even though he is running for a local state office. Remember, the Tonight Show is a national TV show, not a California only show.
Angelides on the other hand would have no interest to anyone outside California, and judging by the pole numbers, there isn't much interest in him in California either. The Tonight Show not putting him on is about ratings, not politics.
It is just after last call at Joe's Tavern A heavily intoxicated man is walking towards his car Lets use ESP to listen in on his thought process Where is my friggin' keys..somebody keeps puttin' them in the wrong pocket... Ahh...here they are (gets into car) (about to start car) Wait...I better not, that was a cool poster I saw earlier today.
California highway shut down due to road rage. Seriously.
Jul 24th 2007 1:03AM (Autoblog)Giveaway: have an iPhone on us!
Jun 29th 2007 9:36PM (Engadget)Bush proposes drastic cuts to PBS budget
Feb 5th 2007 11:29PM (AOL TV)Now, assuming this person wasn't lying, that means a 25% cut in government funding would mean less than a 2% cut in their total budget.
Given there is no reason for any tax payer funding of PBS anything they get should be pure gravy. A reduction of this amount shouldn't have much of an impact on programming. They need to learn to operate on their on revenue.
Nissan and Infiniti land on list of gay friendly automakers
Nov 21st 2006 7:13PM (Autoblog)Just to be clear I have no problem with companys offering such benefits.
Editor explains retracted NWN2 review
Nov 8th 2006 12:50AM (Joystiq)The problem I have with pulling the review is this, if the review had gone the other way, overly praising the game because the reviewer loved the genre, it would not have been pulled.
The review was what it was. Let people read it and judge it for themselves. If they were that concerned about it they could have sought out a reviewer that loved the genre and had him/her post their viewpoint.
Tonight Show accused of favoring Arnold
Oct 13th 2006 12:35AM (AOL TV)Completely false. The equal time laws do not apply in such a case. Stations that didn't show any of his movies during that time were just being overly cautious.
Also, the equal time rules, as written, clearly do not apply to the Tonight Show. "The rules do not apply to news programs, interview shows and documentaries in which the candidate is not the sole focus."
Schwarzenegger, because of his movie career, has some interest to a national audience even though he is running for a local state office. Remember, the Tonight Show is a national TV show, not a California only show.
Angelides on the other hand would have no interest to anyone outside California, and judging by the pole numbers, there isn't much interest in him in California either. The Tonight Show not putting him on is about ratings, not politics.
-Keith
MADD's new DWI awareness posters are a smash
Oct 12th 2006 10:44PM (Autoblog)A heavily intoxicated man is walking towards his car
Lets use ESP to listen in on his thought process
Where is my friggin' keys..somebody keeps puttin' them in the wrong pocket...
Ahh...here they are (gets into car)
(about to start car) Wait...I better not, that was a cool poster I saw earlier today.
Engadget's relaunch giveaways: Slingbox AV!
Oct 5th 2006 9:53PM (Engadget)Engadget HD giveaways: win a Samsung HL-S5679W DLP with LED backlight
Oct 4th 2006 11:49PM (Engadget HD)Reserve Your Own Flying Car
Jul 29th 2006 1:31PM (Luxist)