LegendK1ll3r

I'm pretty sure you're thinking of Kanye West.

I started with Sands of Time, though my favorite (even though it doesn't say to list that in my entry) is still the 2008 PoP (and for contests sake, 360 version).

You even messed up your own message about your failure. Sucks to be you.

I'm pretty sure we all know CAG is where 98% of the deal posts originate from anyway, even if Joystiq doesn't link to them for some random and obscure reason.

It would be nice, though. Undoubtedly because "CCG" likely got it from CAG to begin with, along with GameStop actually sponsoring a giveaway on CAG right now featuring / from this sale, not to mention CAG also has a few GS reps. that post there regarding deals and the like... but no, let's go with this Cheap College Gamer site! Fantastic.

As of this morning, the coupon code "20XBOX" was still working, which takes 20% off of your order. It's worth a shot to any of those wanting to order a 360 game (AC2 for $25 shipped).

Very clever, Penny Arcade, you have accomplished your biggest spoof of all, mocking Half-Life 2: Episode 3. I'm sure it was all a ruse to begin with, just to lead up to the inevitable "there won't be an episode 3" tag-line.

Well played, clerks.

I think Ubisoft may have accidentally given you Red Steel 1 in Red Steel 2's case.

No, I'm not saying that either. 7.5 isn't a "bad score", it's a mediocre or average score, in my book (sometimes a bit above average). I'm saying that instead of showcasing any sort of higher reviews, they chose to showcase the lower ones.

That's my point. There are plenty of other reviews, that score it in the mid 8's or low 8's, some in the 9's, and about 3-4 that score it at 7 or below. Instead of choosing from the wide variety of 8's they had available, or the brass amount of other scores, they only posted the lowest of the lows. THAT, is my point.

Yes, it is the same Legend. ;)

Also, @Monkey; My point is they only posted ONE positive review, and 3 negative ones. I don't want all positive, but 1 positive and 3 negative? Especially when comparing the much higher scores from more reputable sites (like Destructoid's 9.0)? That's my point; they just posts the bad ones because they have some sort of bias, because I guess they are GoW marks or something. Don't get me wrong, I love GoW, but games shouldn't be compared and shuttered because they are like something. If that were the case, we'd never have any games, because all games imitate each other in some fashion or another.

I've never seen them do a "meta-review" on a game and only post negative reviews. In-fact, they usually post much more than 4 reviews, if memory serves me correctly. That's why I'm a bit disappointed by this article, it just focuses on the bad, when there is much more good, from plenty of reputable sources; at that.

Really, you posted nearly all of the bad reviews, but left all the positive ones (especially the 9.0 from Destructoid) out? This game has been getting fairly good reviews, with IGN / 1UP / and of-course Eurogamer (do they like anything?) being the lowest of the lows.

I think you should actually post some of the brighter reviews up there, otherwise this article just seems to state that you were hoping for the game to suck, and are only posting the lowest ones to prove some kind of obscure and nonsensical point.