jazir

i'll take a 3g network with 4g speeds that will work on current phones right now then (theoretically) faster down the line 4g network that need new cell radios ANYDAY OF THE FUCKING WEEK

@fubarweb i'm just a techie, my knowledge into intel and ARM and AMD goes about as far as what i glean from articles such as these, but from what i understand, the main thing holding intel's x86 architecture back from the mobile market is the same thing thats causing them problems in laptops/netbooks which is power consumption.

to my understanding ARM was successful because it provided better speed with less power usage compared to intel

@jazir5 when i say destroyed, i mean allowing arm to achieve market domination in the mobile market

i need to find a way to make a company name out of the phrase "fu*ked up by a yeti"

Can someone please explain to me how intel allowed themselves to get destroyed so thoroughly in their own industry? i'm surprised they allowed.....anyone to get such a stranglehold on their market(processors) by simply going into a different sector of it(portables)

@sumsimpleracer

Wait a minute.....you have internet and you still looking at pictures of naked women instead of videos?

so basically what they're doing is saying the carriers can go fuck themselves and their squabbles, we'll enlist the largest handset maker in the world with billions to lay the groundwork for an amazing coast to coast insanely fast 4g data network that will probably beat everything the carriers in the u.s have to offer currently.

true nation wide data coverage is a good thing

Now i'd like you to direct your attention the socket of the arm where the prosthetic will house a sim card for next gen communications

@Foetoid The 3gs has 256 mb of ram and so does the ipad. The iphone 4 will have 512

I'm surprised all companies don't strive for this. It actually pains me that this is still considered innovation as opposed to standard