DPolski

@Dig Deep
It's cool how everyone always responds to the first comment only.

But in other news, this is a great move for Microsoft. They've got the most affordable console on the market. This will be great for people have been holding out the past few years.

@chieftom

But from a business stand point, it'd be more practical to add an aesthetic appeal to the product in order to sell more.

@pankomputerek
You probably mean 36k...

I'll take two please.

@sacguy
I agree.

I bought my Wii back when I only had standard definition televisions. Now that ever TV in my house is 1080p I can't stand to play it. It's fun when I have people over and what not, but to use for online multiplayer (LOL!) or singleplayer games is just...horrible.

Why not make it look a bit more stylish and lose some MPG's for the sake of actually being able to produce something like this?

I really want a new racing game. I have a good feeling for this game for some reason...

I don't understand why they feel the need to charge all of the sudden. The whole Hulu concept, being free, seems to be working out great. Just keep the ads and make it free and you're fine.

I might actually consider paying $4.99 a month for it WITHOUT ads.

@icon808
Lack of advertising. Lack of innovation. Lack of being a good deal. Lack of anything appealing to be honest...

Yea, but the demographic that Joystiq is aimed at are nerdier people that know their way around a computer and are more likely to have Chrome or MF.