Ludwig Kietzmann

@AwRy108

We'll keep swapping out reviewers until you get one you agree with.

@Kirkpad

No, I mean the levels at the end are much less interesting, visually.

@Uniform solidState Messenger

You're not wrong, though I think "contempt" is a little too extreme. I love Mass Effect 2 -- it succeeds in so many important areas, where other shooters just can't -- even though I think they jettisoned a bit too much of what made the first game interesting.

Their priorities have shifted, which is fine when they make it work (and they did in ME2), but I'm definitely wary of that avoidance mindset. It says interesting ideas that aren't wholly successful should be deleted, rather than investigated further.

I think these thoughts came up because Human Revolution is not an event-filled tunnel that's been so refined that it couldn't possibly frustrate anyone in the world. Not to dismiss games like that, but you don't really have as much opportunity to really play in them. DX is challenging, emergent and has a few rough edges, and fantastic if you bring skill, patience and imagination to the table.

@Kresh

It was a joke.

@Kresh

That's a pretty reductionist interpretation of what I'm saying. You're overreacting.

@Startingline13 ArmlessOctopus

More explicitly noted now!

@RichardMitchell

Not anymore!

@Anticrawl

Sanchez-Crespo has been, among other things, a technology architect, and has taught programming at a university. I'd be surprised if being a CEO suddenly made him incapable of reciting or commenting on specifications of a devkit Novarama is using. A vitriolic rant doesn't seem warranted here.

@A Sandwich

It's actually the product of some software they're writing to replace me. It needs some adjustment, apparently.

@Acosta02

No, it's yours forever.