Serio

The demo didn't look any worse than the predecessor. I'm honestly surprised at the amount of people that seem to prefer graphics over gameplay. I just finished playing through Chaos Theory for the twenty first time(yes, I keep count), and the game is still as enjoyable as it was the first time around, despite looking extremely dated now.

They should take a look at Degeneration. It was undeniably the best movie to carry the Resident Evil title, as it didn't change any of the already existing characters, and stuck to the established story. These movies just take the concept and recreate it with a few familiar names.

I already see this ending up to Hitman fans like Fallout 3 did to Fallout fans.

Apparently you haven't played Empire: Total War then.

"Master Next-Generation technology"? Ever heard of the little game called Crysis? That's Next-Generation.

You can't even do all things in Fallout 3 in a single playthrough, so you've missed out on about 50% of the content.

I wouldn't rely on GameSpot. They gave Empire: Total War an 8.5, apparently not noticing the bugs such as constant crashes, horrible AI, and corruption of saves.

12 hours into the game, and I still haven't encountered any gamebreaking bugs. I've actually begun to wonder if the versions are region specific. My version of Fallout 3 has never crashed on PC, yet, half the people I speak to with the US version seems to crash all the time.

It's not supposed to look next gen. It's supposed to be fun, which is exactly what I believe it will be.

But at least they have Robot Entertainment now. Just because the name has changed doesn't mean the style of the games does too. Anyways, I didn't really doubt it'd sell alot, seeing as it's a combination of two popular things: Halo, and Real Time Strategy.

The graphics look fine to me. I just hope it's because they've spent all the time on the gameplay instead of the graphics.