vidGuy
Member since: Dec 22nd, 2005
vidGuy's Latest Comments
Blog Activity
| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Joystiq | 3429 Comments |
| Engadget | 37 Comments |
| Download Squad | 1 Comment |
| Joystiq Playstation | 1 Comment |
| Joystiq Nintendo | 1488 Comments |
| Joystiq Xbox | 152 Comments |
Featured Stories
Huffpost Live tackles Xbox One with our reviews editor, Richard Mitchell [Update: watch the replay]
Posted on May 21st 2013 6:15PM

Japanese hardware sales, January 9 - 15: Looking back edition
Jan 23rd 2012 9:38AM (Joystiq)First, the link to the GameBoy Color game is in, you know, color. Is your monitor broken? Second, this was clearly a joke.
Now think about what you said.
Japanese hardware sales, January 9 - 15: Looking back edition
Jan 23rd 2012 1:09AM (Joystiq)PIPA on hold in light of 'legitimate issues raised by many,' says Senate majority leader Harry Reid [update]
Jan 20th 2012 12:31PM (Joystiq)There are good reasons for the focus on foreigners. In particular, anyone hosting infringing content from within the US is easy to get at and take down. If the content is hosted outside of the US, though, there are problems of jurisdiction and extending US copyright law abroad. These bills intended to minimize those problems.
EA claims First Amendment protections against expected helicopter lawsuit
Jan 9th 2012 10:28PM (Joystiq)Free speech rights create many limits to trademark rights, not just parody. Did you notice that this post used the words "Battlefield 3"? Did you know those words are trademarked? http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4001:vn68f5.2.1
That's nominative fair use of trademark at work there, under the "news reporting" prong. The question here is not whether they used the mark, but whether they actually traded on the mark. It's a legal distinction that turns on the intent of the use and whether consumers are confused about the sponsorship (or lack thereof) by Textron.
EA claims First Amendment protections against expected helicopter lawsuit
Jan 9th 2012 10:15PM (Joystiq)Trademarks protect brands and consumer expectations. Trademark infringement occurs when a defendant actually "trades" on the mark by using it to identify the maker, source, or seller of the product, for example by using the word "Fender" on a guitar. Nominative fair use occurs when a defendant uses the mark other than as a trademark, such as by writing an article about guitars and actually using the trademarked word "Fender." You can't talk about Fender guitars without using that word.
In a racing game, a big selling point can be the realism of in-game models of actual cars, so the game actually "trades on" those marks by using them in the game. Nobody is buying this game for the particular helicopters used in game. Easy win for EA.
12 Days of Joyswag: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Collector's Edition (or: free dragons)
Dec 18th 2011 4:50PM (Joystiq)Activision trumpets $1 billion for Modern Warfare 3
Dec 12th 2011 11:16AM (Joystiq)It's a fair comparison when you consider the markets for these things. There is a much bigger market for blockbuster films, just as there is for the Ford Fusion over the Murcielago. When you convince enough people to spend $1 billion on your product, that's impressive. Dollars is dollars.
How to block ads on the Xbox 360 Dashboard
Dec 9th 2011 1:11PM (Joystiq)Nintendo officially denies Miyamoto's plan to step down within Nintendo
Dec 8th 2011 10:02AM (Joystiq)EFF working to make console modding legal
Dec 5th 2011 5:52PM (Joystiq)All patents have a limit of 20 years in the US. It is a very powerful right for a small amount of time - usually only 17 years of effective life after the patent is granted. Copyright is a different scheme and provides a much narrower right for a longer period of time.