Sinxlegend

Increasing the price of the cards will actually increase the incentives for piracy. The problem isn't a technical one, it's a human one.

Orgasm! Sans phallic stimulation

@minneman Does she make her cash by doing what you do here? If that's the case, I'd rather be broke.

Two industry giants going head to head. Who will win? Find out next time on Corporatecraft Episode III!

"Normally, these kinds of deals have perhaps one marquee title playing the role of siren, calling your wallet-shaped ship to its rocky, mediocre-game covered shores; however, this deal is different."

I couldn't help but log in and praise this excellent metaphor.

Must have been an inside job. I mean, who else could have made it safely past all those sentry guns, two headed hydras, and hell hounds guarding the lab?

L.A. Noire: The Complete Edition... remind me why I ever bothered to spend all that money for the DLCs again?

@CarmineSaved

So, basically you only like MW3 because you got it for free. And since you try your damn hardest to emphasize about getting free stuff, does that mean you are cheap and probably will never pay for games full price anyways?

Along that logic you like MW3 because that's the only game you own out of those two. You probably won't be able to own BF3 because you are so cheap. Since you won't likely own BF3 you want to tell everyone that the game is stupid so you won't have to be jealous of the people that do own it right?

PROTIP: In the future, if you want to convince anyone that MW3 is superior to BF3, don't tell them you got the game for free. Because you have just lost all credibility for any argument you can make my friend.

@xTHE MEAT The player limits on the console version could be restricted due to hardware limitations. I'm sure DICE would have wanted to implement 64 players on the consoles given a choice. On the other hand, it's still better than not having the game available on consoles. Not everyone has the ability to constantly upgrade their PCs to play the latest AAA games.

@Justinian I think it might be more biased if he only had positive thing to say about the game. At the end he gave it a 4.5/5 and to be honest, some people don't give a crap about the lengthy review, they merely look at the score on Metacritic. It's a good game, but even good games have flaws. I like it as much as you do, however, preventing others from pointing out what they think are flaws is just plain silly.