dustin

The penguin: But it doesn't say how much faster. So if it can do 7:36 instead of 7:38, it's still slower. In any case, you would think a 650 hp "racing-spec" 722 SLR wouldn't post a ring time about the same as the GT-R. Which just goes to show that the GT-R is truly a super-bargain supercar.

Ya just like how nobody likes the R32 still today. Don't think so.

No matter how good drivers get, the fact will remain that humans make mistakes.

If the 480 bhp model is the one that supposedly does 7:38, then the 530 bhp Evo-spec model may have a good chance of shaving 10 seconds off the lap time with its 50 extra bhp. The $191,700 997 GT2 will have 530 bhp, and as stated by someone else on here, the GT2 is very close with the GT in performance. So we will just have to wait and see.

And many people wouldn't be caught dead in a chevy. Racer X is what I would call the anti-super car enthusiast.

Me personally I think the Vette and GT-R are both impressive machines.

Ya....I would much rather it be a hyundai.

No matter what all the online car sites say, the fact is that the GT-R's weight has not been officially announced yet.

100 km/h is 62 mph

The camaro won't be anywhere near as fun to drive.

Spending money is a hobby.