David

They are awaiting on app store approval. They probably got their app disapproved for something sexual, female heroes and civilians.

@samxdx Especially if it was equal up and down.

I'ld be willing to off Kim Jong Il for gigabit. Hell, make it 10 gbps and I would off just about anyone.

By the gods that are Engadget, please bestow me with a shirt.

I'm not seeing the bad side to this.

Dane Cook: The guy is just a F*cking idiot.

This whole mess seems highly illogical. Based on the 8th amendment excessive bail, excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments are prohibited I would safely say that the RIAA is breaching (and successfully) the bill of rights. The statutory damages are ludicrously high. When one song is awarded as close to a yearly income, it is safe to say that is a cruel and unusual punishment, especially if you take into consideration they were intentionally redistributing, whats more I doubt they were even charging people. At absolute most the offense should be 200 times the cost of the song and even that is too high in my opinion. I myself would like to know just how much of the damages the RIAA gives the artists. I would almost be willing to bet they don't see a dime. Besides, is a song really worth $1? I think not. Now if only the artists could ditch the RIAA. They need them almost as much as the world needs Iran and N. Korea.

hope ftw

Emeralds because they are a beautiful green.

looking ftw