liquidsoap89 PSN: liquidsoap89

While I love the idea of morality in video games, I totally agree that it hasn't quite been mastered yet. Games like InFamous tease you with the idea of morality, but never go anywhere with it. Instead you get the typical black/white choices a few times throughout the game.

The fact that I even GET to make a choice is awesome, but knowing that a black choice will have a black result gets boring. I want consequences dammit! I want to save a person and have somebody who hated them attack me, or I want to recover the antidote from the bandits to save the town I'm in, only to later find out they were selling the antidote to a DIFFERENT town (a town I totally would have liked more), which consequently died as a result of my actions.

@KungFuChaosNinja

Well I can tell you that the first step in this protest would be getting over our depression. After that I'm not sure protesting would be the best thing to expose ourselves to, seeing as how it could potentially spark that depression again.

@Hunter141072

Nobody needs another DNF.

@Dick Socrates

My question about all this is...

Why does it matter who "owns" the name?

@Gibbeynator

That... Seems to be the impression I got too.

@coil

I think it's pretty well agreed upon that it's now just called DOTA. MOBA is usually just an acronym for the type of game it is (Bloodline Champions being another game in the genre, one that actually kind of fits the genre description better I think).

@Softserve

Though I haven't heard anything about this game being sold at retail stores.

@Warlock

I don't think the titles association has anything to do with where it should end up. The guy who MADE DOTA is working at Valve on DOTA 2, and the way I see it... If anybody should get "ownership" of that title, it should be who made it. Not whoever owns the game you played it in.

But... I've been in the closed beta for months now...

@The angry pro consumer gaming ga

But what if you already have the CE from the 360?