Henry

I honestly don't see anything extra coming the 360 way, just look at another WB Interactivity with the Joker bonus content for the PS3. Something that could have easily have been ported over to the 360 at any time but never did.
Hell, there was a ton of speculation that the 360 was going to get something exclusive and everyone kept quiet about it and, surprise surprise! There was nothing on the 360 side.

@TruGamer66 That's sort of ironic you mention that the only people complaining about PS+ are those who don't know enough about it and then say that paying for X-Box Live gets you just online play.

Yeah, it really shocked me when I first heard about this (just now). Having numerous run-ins with the dickhead that goes by Herald (and not the only one by far, creators and fans alike) even I was shaking my head at the thought of putting him in a book even as some sort of thought that they were thumbing their nose at him in some way. People should know better then to feed the trolls.

Yes, because we all know that people who don't like Marvel's output are just DC fanboys or just FULL OF LIES! Because certainly there's not a bad book being published at Marvel these days and anyone that says so is FULL OF LIE!

Though one look at the past few months and pretty much in 2010 says that it actually is showing up in sales, but I could just be FULL OF LIES! Or a DC fanboy, I guess you know that for sure.

Don't care much for the art overall it almost looks like it's using a ton of referencing and use of sketch-up (which I'm not saying is a bad thing, but sometimes has to be done just right), but the acting is pretty good overall.

Though I swear the 4th panel on the 4th page (where Peter is holding his hands out) looks like it's supposed to be Quesada. :P

Yes, I did read the article, as well as other articles before this from both Rucka and Williams.
So the plot being cut out is why? And for no reason other then it was to be spun out into it's own title by the same creative team (as mentioned from previous articles that, yes, I did read).
So instead of wanting to go back and do his own stuff again, something he's mentioned time and again as wanting to do in both his blog and previous written articles (which I did and do read), but it's actually meta-text style code for being pissed at DC and that he, in fact, IS jumping to Marvel? So instead of just reading the article I was as well supposed to read into the article and pull out the various nuggets that suggest he was saying something completely different?
I'll try that then.

What is this now? The second time Rucka has said he's not going to do anything in the near future for DC and people get in an uproar that DC drove him away? And now the second time Rucka has come out and said there's no bad blood involved?
No, of course not. No one can just leave and do something on their own, there HAS to be some ulterior motive behind it all.

I'm sure that DC and Ian Sattler do understand the why people are upset about it and I think a bigger reason why they didn't say anything against the story (outside of Robinson being on the panel) is the whole thing of supporting their creators and not throwing them and their stories under the bus whenever something like this happens.
Just look at Waid, among others', reaction to when Didio made some jokes about Final Crisis, something Rucka defended as just being towel slapping rather then slamming it like how Waid interpreted it as.

Though I think it's really overkill to do this, I can't help but laugh at a good number of these.