Can someone explain this to me? In the US, AGs prosecute lawbreakers. So why are they deciding the law in Australia? Seems to me that the people who prosecute crimes shouldn't be deciding what the laws are. Its a clear cut conflict of interest. So why do they allow this over there?
As long as I can remember, madcatz has been making the crappiest gaming accessories. I hope their horrid products don't tarnish the Gears of War license.
This is needed. These pirates are stealing the hard work of developers to make undeserved profit, or for no good reason at all. This is an excellent development.
PSN reactivation delayed for 'further testing,' likely not coming back this week
May 7th 2011 12:04AM (Joystiq)All I can say to your post is...
INDEED.
GOG.com selling entire JoWood catalog at up to 75% off
Apr 29th 2011 8:30AM (Joystiq)South Australian AG will support R18+ rating if 15+ is scrapped
Apr 28th 2011 9:29AM (Joystiq)BloodRayne: Betrayal this summer on XBLA and PSN, courtesy of WayForward
Mar 31st 2011 12:50PM (Joystiq)Mad Catz to produce Gears of War 3 accessories for Xbox 360
Jan 28th 2011 6:38AM (Joystiq)Australian federal cabinet approves R18+ games rating, passing along to AGs
Dec 6th 2010 2:10AM (Joystiq)Those idiots let the people who prosecute crimes approve the laws? Doesn't that seem like a conflict of interest?
Forgive my bluntness.
Hands-on: SOCOM 4 (with PlayStation Move!)
Mar 11th 2010 3:47PM (Joystiq)ESA applauds formation of Dept. of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property
Feb 16th 2010 8:36AM (Joystiq)ESA applauds formation of Dept. of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property
Feb 16th 2010 8:35AM (Joystiq)