null

Army of Three.

duh

You're right. You don't need to read the Financial Times. However, I would suggest the "Chicago Manual of Style" or a dictionary.

No, but you can sue for breach of contract. If the licensee contract made some claims that were never realized and if scheduled dates were never met, then they have a case. It's not a matter of the engine being "good". It's a matter of the engine (and the engine maker) meeting contractual obligations.

Are you Ken Kutaragi in disguise?

A click through rate of 2% in online advertising is considered a success. You don't need to sell the content to every user for it to be successful. The cost to distribute is negligible and the cost to produce (these are previously made tracks with previously established distribution rights) which means that a high percentage of the revenue, much higher than the actual game sale, is profit.

300,000 downloads at 500 points == almost 2 million dollars. Not bad for a low cost add-on.

Get off your high horse and shut the hell up. Nobody is forcing you to buy the content and you are NOT entitled to it. It's just a bunch of songs for a video game not some kind of plebeian right.

Some people feel that they get enjoyment out of these packs and that they are worth their money. That makes them retarded? You just spent eight bucks on a plastic guitar and you feel all self-righteous about people spending a few dollars for some extra songs? Shut. Up.

>The difference, if any, is that the DS has sold 13 million units to gamers

The massive sales of the likes of Nintendogs, Animal Crossing, the various Brain Trainings, Tamagotchi would disagree with you.