Matt

Problem is that now even as the reviewers may adjust their scores, readers are still just as up-in-arms over a "bad" score.

It's not like you made the game, why do you care the # it gets? Play it if you like it.

I don't understand the problem. A 70/100 or 7/10 is a GOOD score. At least, that's the way scores are designed. 50/100 should be average: playable but not exceptional. 70 should be above average and a fun time. If you're seriously just basing it on the number a game is given, then you're simply foolish.

Read the actual reviews and ignore the numbers. Gamers think a 50 is horrific (which it shouldn't be) and a 70 is barely playable, oftentimes. Because of this I say we ignore the numbers/letters that are used for grading altogether, unless there's some sort of standard that is given for the grading scheme.

Hey you, I know what you're looking at, and I don't appreciate stares unless you plan to do something about it...

Problem is screens can't do a ragdoll game justice. You need to see video or, more realistically, try it for yourself. But for such a small game I doubt a demo is in the works, unfortunately, because I think it would only spread the game's success.

Granted, those who have played the PC version will know how fun it is and be more inclined to give it a shot, but still...can't help but feel like it might need a little kick in the pants to get it going...

Wow. I've gotta say, if done right, this could be a great multiplayer game...

Post that link on Scrawl and they'll probably put up the petition link--I've seen a bunch of petitions listed there.

Now they just need to move the theatrical trailers from the Game store to the Video store...

Luigi. Hands down. First off, Luigi is faster and jumps higher. (read: isn't a fatty)

Not to mention I like green better than red, and I don't appreciate why he gets kicked to the side all the time, unfairly.

I'm not a fan of the video itself, but hey, can't beat good information, right?

Well for the record, I didn't buy any of those games, MakaiOokami. I didn't think any of them was going to interest me long enough to purchase them.

So you're right in comparing it to three other games I didn't think were worth the money, lol. I understand your point, but I just thought that SSHD got boring too quickly, even for a $10 price point. There are few PSN games I'd buy, though--PixelJunk Monsters is one of the VERY few...much more replayability and many more hours of fun, for the price...

Just my opinion though--someone else might love SSHD and think it's worth more than PJM. Either way, SSHD just wasn't for me.

Yea, hopefully it won't be too pricey. Otherwise I'll be annoyed (but still might get it...)