NachoDudeX

@C1ph3rDivyne Uh... Nintendo didn't make this game... I'm not really sure what exactly you're talking about

@Otimus Yes, video games are serious business and we demand answers to the pressing questions that determine our future!

Seriously lighten up. Video games are a consumer industry, and in order to keep getting info sites like Joystiq can't agitate developers. If Joystiq went and demanded answers from Microsoft, Microsoft still wouldn't answer and would choose to not give anymore interviews. It's just games, dude, not somebody spending your tax money on convertibles.

@Esposch
>implying you're on 4chan

Nothing, because I'd never be able to decide on one thing in time before the earth got burnt.

@RyanS Good idea, how about from now on we don't ever talk about anything or report any news because in a few weeks we'll just be talking about some other news anyway! Same reason I never shower, I'm just going to have to shower again tomorrow anyway!

I'm a bit upset at the lack of Black Sabbath and Megadeth (There's still nothing from Countdown to Extinction or Youthanasia!) but it is still awesome.

@adv2k169
Zero Mission is the canon version. But none of the expanded information was really necessary to the story, all you need to know is "Samus got to Zebes and killed everybody" so they used the NES footage for that so as not to confuse the audience (a person who hasn't played a Metroid game)

@Crusty Magic
Everything should be the same, forever!

@False Yeah, the Prime series is more like a side story, it's not really important to the later plotline, it's just an adventure Samus once went on.

Fusion take place later and isn't relevant to this part of the story.
Zero Mission is a remake of Metroid (I'm not sure why they didn't use footage from that here since it's the canon version).

Metroid Prime: Hunters is... well we like to pretend that never happened.

@golfs4panzys I hear ya. And what's odd is that in previews for this game reviewers express their distaste for MW2's campaign and imply BO is supposed to fix those problems. But why should we listen to these first impressions when they just went back on their opinions a year later?

I still can't figure out how this game got those scores when critics keep stating how mediocre the single player is, and the multiplayer is almost unplayable with all the morons online. Even if you do find a good game online, the shooting itself is still simplistic and hollow compared to other big shooters.