Faren22
Member since: Aug 3rd, 2010
Faren22's Latest Comments
Blog Activity
| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Joystiq | 167 Comments |
Featured Stories
Indie, but not alone: How Vlambeer's advice helped guide Dog Sled Saga
Posted on May 24th 2013 6:40PM

Fan art being accepted for Udon's Mega Man Tribute book
Dec 9th 2010 2:59AM (Joystiq)'Night of the Sacrifice' horror game features mysterious Balance Board function
Dec 9th 2010 2:00AM (Joystiq)Halo: Reach machinima features live-action footage for a cheesy-good time
Dec 8th 2010 9:46PM (Joystiq)Your Shape stretches workout repertoire with new DLC
Dec 8th 2010 2:56AM (Joystiq)IGF China honors indie games from Asia and Australia
Dec 8th 2010 2:28AM (Joystiq)Eric Ruth's 8-bit DJ Hero remake removed thanks to Universal Music
Dec 7th 2010 9:42PM (Joystiq)Actually, this may be considered parody, and therefore protected, which is also a very basic concept, and I don't know why you're not factoring it into your argument. Also, being generally condescending to the people you're arguing with doesn't lend any more credibility to your argument, and just makes people want to believe your points even less. But whatever.
Even if every argument you put forth is true, though, that still doesn't change the fact that Universal could easily have turned a blind eye to this, and it would not have hurt them. It would not have hurt them. I've played the demake. It's all right. By no means is it a comparable game to the actual DJ Hero. It's merely an interesting side note, not designed to draw business away from the original franchise, but rather to honor it. Piracy of video games poses a much larger threat than this guy, because by definition pirates are stealing the exact game of DJ Hero. That hurts business.
Just because something's in a legal gray area doesn't mean it has to be pursued. For example: Look at the hundreds of thousands of videos on Youtube. Look at all the amateur covers of Lady Gaga songs. Whoever is in charge of Lady Gaga's copyright protection obviously does not give a shit about these people doing these covers. Why? Well, because it isn't the official song being used, the people singing these amateur; terrible covers may be protected by certain nuances of copyright law; if they're pursued they may try to take it to court, which is messy, relatively expensive, time-consuming, and bad publicity; and finally because there are much bigger fish to fry.
Copyright law isn't even close to black and white, because the boundaries are always vague, especially when a situation like this occurs. My question is, is this guy even worth Universal's time?
Also, just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I'm oblivious. Please try to keep a more open mind.
'The Hit Box' arcade controller ditches the stick for buttons
Dec 7th 2010 4:42PM (Joystiq)Don't get me wrong, I understand why there's a market for this kind of pad, but sometimes... I wish there wasn't.
Eric Ruth's 8-bit DJ Hero remake removed thanks to Universal Music
Dec 7th 2010 2:07PM (Joystiq)I understand that Universal has the power to pursue this, and I admit that it might fall into a gray area when it comes to how much copyrighted work was used. But "demaking" a game has happened at least once before, to Team Fortress 2, and not only was Valve tolerant enough to let it survive, they loved it and actually gave it a shout-out on their blog.
So that is what I mean when I'm talking about the snide little comment at the end: This man has the power to decide the fate of another person's work (regardless of how derivative it appears, work was put into this demake) and, after using that power and telling Ruth to take his work offline, he is completely unsympathetic. Taking into account the entire situation, with all the nuances, J. Grannis has indeed performed a "dick move."
Eric Ruth's 8-bit DJ Hero remake removed thanks to Universal Music
Dec 7th 2010 1:08PM (Joystiq)Nintendo UK promotion offered Donkey Kong Country Returns in exchange for bananas
Dec 4th 2010 7:10PM (Joystiq)