Lone Starr

@(Unverified)

I don't think that's true. There was a Supreme Court case in 2006 which allowed similar wording in AT&T contracts. That case helps set a precedent for these contracts.

Some day, we'll look back on this online pass bullshit and laugh -- about how good the old days used to be. :/

And of course these figures will be cited simultaneously as why Battlefield is better and worse than Call of Duty. I predict 70 comments. :)

I'd say they developed *something* attractive.

If you divide the number of bans by 100, you get the average age of users effected.

Dayum.

@DevilSei

ಠ_ಠ

As they were, flashlights were a better idea in concept than execution. I'm glad to see the nerf.

As cool as this looks, I will always desire more Jade Empire.

That statement gives them wiggle room if they decide to ban. "Though we had no interest in banning users, they nevertheless did not abide by our request" -- or something like that. It would be stupid but, as companies have shown time and again, the stupid choice is often the most preferred.