teeftwo

@Iamdude
If they didn't like it, then they shouldn't have signed the contract.

@Iamdude
Well, they knew the terms before signing a contract. If they didn't like it they didn't have to do it.

@Ebok007
I agree. It's ok for a Free to Play game. Purchasing $20 or even $50 worth of items is ok because you got a free game. But buying a $50 game to just immediately spend another $10 for DLC is stupid.

@Faceless Troll
Inorite? When I got the game (back in 2006-2007) nobody was even playing online. You'd be lucky to find a few matches a week.

@Zetro
First you will be baked, then turn left 500 feet ahead.

@Masker13
What if every game was like this? Different prices on different distribution systems and you had to log in facebook and give permission to an app to vote to make the prices equal?

@sserschens
Nobody at their studio foresaw this problem? Every other game comes out in the US at regular, even prices. Let's say this is the first international game. They want you to vote if the game should be cheaper, but because they have to communicate the new price change to Sony and they have to change it on their PSN network they will make the game release a week later?

Why not just lower the price now because they know gamers will want that and try to release it at the same time? This is bad PR.

Just b/c a game is extremely hard or challenging doesn't make it fun. It might be fun for 0.05% of the population, but with those types of numbers don't cry if the game doesn't make GOTY.

@aray48
I know right? You're supposed to release a demo before the game comes out so people will buy it day 1. Releasing a demo months after the game is out is stupid because then you have to compete with other games. And we're talking about some other AAA games in the passed 2 months...BF3, MW3, Skyrim...I mean if you haven't got GoW for Christmas then you're probably not getting it any time soon either.

I play portable games in my friend's car when we hang out.