DoctorSmart

Well, it's good to know that if I feel like indulging my masochist side, I have a new game that I can make a comment about and be verbally abused.

@Snichy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_of_Warcraft:_The_Board_Game

@MrsAngelD I would have to agree about the changes to talents. Simplifying specs and making your talent choices less important is not something I look forward to. However, screw the kiddies who are all upset about the lore and Pandas being kid stuff. I happen to remember the Pandaren monk in WC3, and I thought it was a cool concept that pre-dates Kung Fu Panda

@Traptz Congrats on having one the most sexist comments I've seen in a while.

@mmogaddict Nah, Uwe Boll manages to actually make money once in a while

"Modern tabletop design looks at things like classes and levels as being relics in many ways -- elements that made sense as a crutch when the design of RPGs was one step removed from tactical wargames"

I might be out of touch here, but I'm pretty sure most of the popular tabletop systems are class/level based. Pathfinder, D&D, even World of Darkness has some class background, whether it be restrictions on Clan/Tribe/etc. What systems are you talking about?

Games this early in development should refrain from making promises. It will always come back to haunt them when they inevitably can't deliver.

@rhorle If you're going to argue a point, find a more recent article to reference. A lot can change in 3 years.

@rhorle lol at using an almost 3 year old article to prove a point. If you can't find a more recent reference, then you're talking out of your ass.

@urgan fail meme is fail. Just because you weren't born before these pinnacles of gaming were created doesn't make them shit.