Zulu Edison

@OrangeGamer

boy are you going to be disappointed then. Read the description more carefully.

A) 3 preconstructed decks
B) no PVP, only a set number of rivals to play against
c) no badass music like the gameboy version had
d)awful awful "customizable" avatars. They couldn't look more boring/unpokemon-like. I'm just not sure what they were thinking.

@Jim Carey Grant

These games were great, this is definitely a tempting purchase.

Seems like a strange assumption that they would be "already" prepping this for the ngp...given that there is no information supporting that, and the console won't be out even in japan till the end of the year and even then you think one of the first titles square puts out is going to be a rerelease of a psp game?
Uh what...

@FriedConsole

Unfortunately I bet the first thing we see from them is a Disgaea 3 port. Not that I'm disappointed about that, but it just wasn't the best in the series.

Can't wait for news of Disgaea 4, although this brings up the question of how these types of games are going to be released now. It will probably follow the same pattern, ps3 and some time later ngp. Although a dual release of disgaea 4 on ps3 and ngp would be incredible, especially with that rumored moving your data back and forth between the consoles feature.

@phinn

This pvp looks way worse than the old PVP. What is this arena crap, I want, let's walk outside of rogue encampment and go right now punk.

Why are they trying to turn this into WoW? I'm becoming more and more disappointed with each new thing I learn about DIII

" In Diablo 2, vendors would be available for you to make up for that, by allowing you to buy gear that's good enough."

I'm sorry what??? Has the writer of this article ever played Diablo II? The vendor system was a complete joke, as was gold. I am really not looking forward to D III at all anymore, it's looking more and more like world of warcraft diablo lovechild, instead of staying true to its roots.

please let this happen

@(Unverified)

yes pleaaaaaseeee, android app would be fantastic.

@Lucian Armasu

yeah I noticed that, but i'm secretly hoping it runs awfully so I can justify getting the Aria only because I honestly think this (The captivate) is one of the ugliest phones I've seen in a long time. The front isn't awful, but isn't attractive either, and the back is appallingly ugly. From the fake carbon fiber print to the "galaxy S" signature font... What were they thinking. Why couldn't they have just made this an attractive phone as well.

While the Aria may be greatly outstripped in specs, It runs flawlessly (which so far cannot be said of the tested out pre-release versions of the captivate), has a really nice version of htc's sense skinned on top, and is a much much better looking phone. and is 70$ cheaper, which might not matter to most people, but since I'm still young enough that my parents pay my phone bill, that part matter's to me.

All in all this shouldn't have to be a consideration, i'm just really dissapointed by how hideous the captivate is.

@iLikezGadgets


why are you linking wirefly, they are well known scammers...

so to reiterate I have to choose between the aria for 130 or the captivate for 200.

assuming the reviews come back positive the big decision will be whether or not to get the captivate even though it is very very ugly.