cafeman
Member since: Jan 25th, 2006
cafeman's Latest Comments
Blog Activity
| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Joystiq | 7 Comments |
Featured Stories
Schilling says he could lose $50 million of his own money in 38 Studios implosion [update: Chafee responds]
Posted on May 29th 2012 10:00AM

Pepsi taps into today's culture with ... pinball?
Mar 4th 2007 8:45PM (Joystiq)Nah, that'd require thought.
In defense of the "PlayStation generation"
Mar 4th 2007 8:37PM (Joystiq)'Ask any gamer who's gotten a 100 percent completion in Grand Theft Auto III if they were inclined to give up because it was "too hard."'
You're comparing strongly task-oriented gameplay with short-term highly achievable goals built on the same principles as a Skinner box against an activity that requires strong abstract and conceptual skills, both of which require a significant amount of development, and neither of which offers strong short-term pay-offs.
I don't agree with the article in that games are the cause of the lack of attention in kids, but saying that beating 100% of GTAIII is analogous to learning complex higher math or science is facile at best. I know you're supposedly "only" blogging (and pulling in an income from it, natch), but there's a reason *why* games and gamers cop so much flack. It's because of comparisons like the one presented by Kyle. People other than gamers don't take schlock like this seriously because it's not even close to rational - it's middle-school level logic. Gamers like to laugh at Jack Thompson, but what I think most don't realise is that when comparisons like this are made, it simply provides ammunition to the rest of the media to have a laugh at "gamers" as a whole. Somewhat unfairly, I might add, given that it's just one mouthpiece that's making such a statement.
There are plenty of rebuttals against what Cohen is suggesting (including a misguided educational system, a strong disconnect between learning and personal development / success, and so on), but saying that gamers aren't afraid of working hard because they'll do lots of short-term tasks with immediate pay-offs isn't one of them.
Why American and Japanese games are different
Jan 20th 2007 12:07AM (Joystiq)Different cultures do look for different things in games, but the first and the fourth bullet points are tenuous at best. I think this has more to do with a bad summary of the article than the article itself, as there's a heck of a lot more detail in the 1up piece.
Free-roaming games such as Zelda and Mario 64 have also been extremely popular in Japan. And, FPSs are also very popular in the UK and Australia, neither of which has a "gun-culture".
The free-roaming vs. cinematic gameplay only makes sense if you look at GTA and FF (insert generic JRPG here) at the exclusion of everything else. Western RPGs are equally as prone to linear storylines, no matter how they try to hide it. KOTOR, for example, was highly linear, even though characters would react slightly differently to you depending on your actions.
My personal opinion is that apart from the preference against FPSs, it has more to do with the role and audience of games in Japanese culture. A wider cross-section of society plays games in Japanese society compared to Western society. It's like manga - it's just something that people do.
That directly influences game design. Games like Oblivion are just not oriented towards people who don't play games for long periods of time. It's a *world* to explore, not just a game. That has implications for time spent playing, which in turn makes it unattractive to anyone who can't spare that time (which, to be honest, is most people). Games like Harvest Moon and Animal Crossing tell you what to do, give you very basic tasks, and set you to work. You can play a day of game time, maybe discover something new (or not), and then drop it and do something else. That's why I believe the DS is doing so well in Japan and why proportionally, open-ended gameplay experiences tend not to do as well in total marketshare as they do in the US.
Survey: 54% of stores have PS3s in stock
Jan 16th 2007 10:21PM (Joystiq)What's more important is *how* those samples were obtained. Are they representative, or not? A sampe of 52 is more than adequate for identifying trends, but the more important question is whether or not the 52 were selected using any appropriate statistical methodology.
Where people frequently get confused is they think greater numbers = a better survey. That's not necessarily true - if you're trying to identify statistically significant differences between populations (such as preference for console A vs. console B between males and females), having too many respondents can actually magnifify the power of the test, making it identify differences that while statistically significant, are so small in absolute terms as to be meaningless. What difference does it make if 51.2% of males prefer the 360 compared to 51.3% of females, even if *is* statistically significant?
Today's ye-haw-iest game video: Wii Play - Cow Run
Jan 6th 2007 5:09AM (Joystiq)People are going to be *very* disappointed when they get their hands on it. It's basically a collection of training exercises to teach you how to use the Wiimote. Unless you're really obsessive-compulsive, you'll only be briefly entertained.
What if... you could learn real guitar through games?
Jan 5th 2007 5:01PM (Joystiq)I always thought it would have been great if the game had used the microphone to pick up what notes you were playing.
Garyboy DS, GaryCube, GarySP, GaryBox, GaryS2
Jan 25th 2006 7:47AM (Joystiq)http://nintendoinsider.com/site/EpluZVpZlZhJoXkYvf.php