Mudron
Member since: Dec 20th, 2006
Mudron's Latest Comments
Blog Activity
| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Joystiq | 24 Comments |
| ComicsAlliance | 1 Comment |
Featured Stories
Xbox One sticking with $499 price, Kinect still 'core part' of experience
Posted on Jun 19th 2013 8:30PM

'Firefly' Fan Webcomic Takes 'Serenity' Carnage to New Levels [Exclusive]
Apr 19th 2010 4:51PM (ComicsAlliance)Mal: "Hey, look! A drink-holder!"
JBO: Joystiq Box Office, March 1 - March 5
Mar 6th 2010 12:25AM (Joystiq)Infinity Ward spells out Modern Warfare 2 voice cast
Aug 21st 2009 3:23PM (Joystiq)DIY: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: Prestige Edition for $110.40
Jul 28th 2009 2:26PM (Joystiq)Ubisoft launches gaming portal on Facebook
Jul 20th 2009 6:52PM (Joystiq)Silent Hill: Not your mother's cosplay
May 19th 2009 12:21AM (Joystiq)http://www.cosplay.com/photo/921308/
GameStop's employee checkout policy may be illegal [update]
Apr 10th 2009 4:21PM (Joystiq)Secondly (and this has been brought up several times in this thread alone), why does Gamestop need to gut all of their new games when they could just keep their pre-order display boxes on the shelves (or simply distribute printed box art that could be inserted into the empty cases already on store shelves) rather than gutting actual retail copies of the game? There is NO practical reason to gut new games, aside from letting employees "borrow" games as extra incentive to keep them from quitting their shitty jobs.
It still stands as simple fact that selling gutting games as "new" is an insulting policy that Gamestop continues to inexplicably foist upon it's customers - a policy that likely won't end until Gamestop collapses under the weight of it's own bullshit as it's consumer base begins to wholeheartedly embrace digital distribution.
GameStop's employee checkout policy may be illegal [update]
Apr 10th 2009 3:41PM (Joystiq)GameStop's employee checkout policy may be illegal [update]
Apr 10th 2009 3:25PM (Joystiq)Pardon my french, but fuck you, buddy. Once an employee had laid hands on the game inside the box, that game isn't "new" anymore. You can swear up and down that no one has done anything with that disc but put it in a paper sleeve for safe-keeping, but customers shouldn't have to rely solely on an employee's word that what they're buying is actually an untouched piece of software.
When you go to the Apple store to buy an iPod, the iPods aren't all kept unboxed/loose in a drawer beneath the cash register, precisely because it looks SHADY AS SHIT WHEN EMPLOYEES ARE ALLOWED TO UNBOX FRESH INVENTORY AND SELL IT BACK TO THE CUSTOMER AS "NEW" - why in the hell should I expect any less when plopping down $60 for a brand-new piece of software at Gamestop?
GameStop's employee checkout policy may be illegal [update]
Apr 10th 2009 12:50PM (Joystiq)