you know

i like egm. been reading it forever.

Fuck that game looks hardcore!

sigh... more developer hubris...


dumbasses

ew jake, non fiction.... eeeeeew....

"Is there any rationalization at all for charging 60% more for a title a year and a half old?"

and already has several forts (fake+ports) made of it? ive got grid wars on my XP desktop.

OMG unaltered!

darwinia= best game ever

justice reposted his analogy, so will i.


"Let's say you had a ten year old son, and got your wife a diamond necklace, and your son was with you when you bought it. The son then asks if he can tell his mom about it, and you say "no, just wait a couple days". He then asks what you would do if he told, and you say "son, I'd beat the crap out of you" and the INSTANT he gets home he tells her, and then you beat the crap out of him. Sounds right."


irregardless of the creepy, child abusey thing that you said, that analogy is wrong. and misleading. Kotaku isn't a "child" and actually HAS rights in this situation. Further more, the "father" sony, didnt actually give the "child" kotaku the information. the "child" kotaku heard it from a friend of his on the playground and then asked the "father" sony if it was true. the "father" sony said they had no comment, but if you tell anyone else, ill stop buying you food. the "child" kotaku, unable to resist the awesome secret "he" kotaku had decided to tell everyone in spite of his "father's" sony's assholeish demands. sony then stopped buying kotaku food. methinks, the father should have been more careful about keeping his secret from the neighborhood children...

and lastly, the "father" sony didn't tell them at all about any sort of press release window.

please research your facts next time before you put together creepy analogies.

"Let's say you had a ten year old son, and got your wife a diamond necklace, and your son was with you when you bought it. The son then asks if he can tell his mom about it, and you say "no, just wait a couple days". He then asks what you would do if he told, and you say "son, I'd beat the crap out of you" and the INSTANT he gets home he tells her, and then you beat the crap out of him. Sounds right."


irregardless of the creepy, child abusey thing that you said, that analogy is wrong. and misleading. Kotaku isn't a "child" and actually HAS rights in this situation. Further more, the "father" sony, didnt actually give the "child" kotaku the information. the "child" kotaku heard it from a friend of his on the playground and then asked the "father" sony if it was true. the "father" sony said they had no comment, but if you tell anyone else, ill stop buying you food. the "child" kotaku, unable to resist the awesome secret "he" kotaku had decided to tell everyone in spite of his "father's" sony's assholeish demands. sony then stopped buying kotaku food. methinks, the father should have been more careful about keeping his secret from the neighborhood children...

and lastly, the "father" sony didn't tell them at all about any sort of press release window.

please research your facts next time before you put together creepy analogies.

i understand less, and irregardless. sony has no right to tell anything not owned by them what to do. if sony exec came to your house and said, stop playing your xbox360 or well take away your ps3. and i wont invite you to my birthday party, would you meekly give up the 360?