Mach

This looked good when I saw it being played on Gamespot a couple of days ago. The only strong concern I had was with the spacebar to block thing. Things like that are only included if the developer intends you to use them to progress, but doing so, I think, would make things too easy, perhaps? I'd prefer to see some sort of limiting factor introduced to lessen how often you can use the technique.

11: "Even if it was an updated version of Tempest, it was probably Centuri's best arcade title."

Not unlike Space Giraffe, perhaps? That one's expected to be gameplay complete as of end of March, according to a recent posting on Game Informer, yonder - http://www.gameinformer.com/NR/exeres/16B4AE3D-D867-4191-B917-7B5294D6FE24.htm from Jeff Minter's latest blog update.

Dungeon Keeper 3, return of Magic Carpet = Awesomeness! :D

I'm very pleased by that trailer. :)
Even with the obvious fact that the footage comprises for the most part of cutscenes, what's shown points towards a game, that looks like it could be great fun to play! Lots of the things I wanted to see included appear to have been, in terms of Jimmy's interaction with the school, which is good.
They've quite surpassed what I thought they'd show, tbh. (Although, I didn't know what to expect.)

It looks like an entertaining game, that's going to be well worth the time, for everyone that isn't utterly impaired by "mature" blinkers, to the extent that they'll be able to see Bully as a game in its own right, and not just an "incontroversial Rockstar game". *sighs*

Realise that any "Bully is going to damage our kids" style Thompson-baiting coverage was (at least from the impression of the trailer) wide of the mark - Not that a lot of the more sensationlist reporting often isn't. But, I don't blame reporters. Those guys didn't have the full game, or in all likelihood a renotely complete one, from which to judge. After that, look at what is there, rather than what isn't. This game isn't a sequel; and therefore, shouldn't be judged as such.

#5, if your story about your friend is true, be sure to let him know that the voicework in the trailer is indeed hilarious, and imho very well done. :)

It's a humorous game, not a bloody one. You want to play a humourous game? The enrol queue will be forming outside your favourite games store, in October.

Jdoki, An email might not cut it, I'm afraid. http://www.ico.gov.uk/eventual.aspx?id=19261
There's some info.

http://www.xbox.com/en-GB/live/legal/ (Xbl Uk terms and conditions.)
http://www.ea.com/global/legal/tos.jsp (EA global terms and conditions)
I hope that proves useful.

http://news.spong.com/article/10498

Spong reported on the 2nd that they had, not long before the article was posted, concluded a phonecall with R* UK about Bully. The call confirmed the dropping of the Xbox version, and also that the game would "definitely" release by this Christmas.
Spong's article encouragingly notes that: "we were promised that we will be seeing a lot more on the title ‘very soon indeed’"

I'm really looking forward to getting to play Bully; and it's release happening before the year's through is great news for me! :D

The game isn't only for PSP. It's been announced for PS2 and PC, as well.
http://ps2.gamespy.com/playstation-2/tomb-raider-10th-anniversary-edition/713090p1.html
I don't believe anyone outside of SCI is any the wiser about Crystal Dynamics' vision of the game.

Nick James wrote:
"What the hell's with the Star Wars music?"
It's a leaked internal presentation video, and that's just placeholder music.

How many from that list, you ask? Precisely none of them.
I don't have the kit to play either Crysis/BF2142 (didn't want BF:MC so I've little reason to vigorously pursue the sequel) and "licensed sports yearly rehash 200x"...You're kidding, right?

Two things:
a)License= Focus on promotion and budget, not fun. Often SERIOUSly not fun.

b)I can buy a competitors title, same sport, no shackles, and oodles more fun to boot...Usually for less. ;) (often the licence is irrelevent to me anyway - I just want to play a basketball title, it doesn't matter who's playing to me, as long as the game's fun, and with a strong sense of its own identity.)

Agree with #17?!? I made a mistake there...There was an earlier comment more regarding the way Ad companies function, I agree with THAT.

I agree with #17. Images can be very powerful things. Marketing teams have many tools at hand to achieve their goal, and controversy gets you noticed. I don't believe the "edginess" of these images escaped their attention.

I don't much like the image of the black woman being stood over and held back by the white woman. That's not an aggressive (as in the claws shot) action, but clearly a restrictive one. But if the message is "White PSP>Black PSP", then why is the black woman holding the white woman down on the ground in one image?
I don't call racism on it, but it is probably tripping a line.