Mitch

@pcguru83 You people need to learn to check sources and not take anything Engadgets says as the final truth... Engadget happens to have made a typo, read the source it's a 960 x 640 just like the iPhone.

@Joshua Topolsky What shoes are those, I want some!

3 Cheers for Engadget!

I'm pretty sure the hinge on these things is like the newer Dell Mini 10.

@cabose369 It's called a bug. It happens in software.

Is there anyway to use it with Win XP yet? I haven't really searched at all but I'm just wondering.

There goes Palm.

Wait, you need an app for that? No wonder there are so many apps for the iPod Touch and iPhone, every feature that is included on a Zune is turned into an app...

I kid, I kid.

I barely ever use the wireless sync on my Zune, a bit too slow for me. But can be useful if I'm just adding an album before I go to bed.

@assb10yr Really? You mean since the story actually hit Engadget two days before Gizmodo got the iPhone. If you have another source that tells a different story, please let it be known.

@jwdav If Ford lost a prototype, I called and said hey, someone left your prototype in front of my house they would come get it, especially if they knew it was missing like Apple apparently knew the iPhone was missing (hence they remote killed it). Should he have tried to contact the employee too, yeah assuming he could find contact details based on just the name. But you can't say he didn't try to give it back to the rightful owner.

Someone still needs to as the DA and the police to investigate this kind of stuff. They don't just randomly assume some guy stole something with zero evidence pointing to that. Apple had to say "hey, Jason Chen gave us our iPhone back, look into it as a possible theft."

If Gizmodo chose not to return it when asked, I'd expect the police to get involved but they returned it when asked.

The way I see it assuming the story we've been told is correct, the guy did plenty to try to return it to Apple and when they didn't want it, he sold it, there's no need for him to keep it.

No one can seriously give Apple any credit here, some Apple employee looses it in a bar, Guy A finds it, Guy A tries to give it back to Apple (more than once), they didn't seem to want it after about a month of it being missing, so Gizmodo bought it and then was forced to return it.

Now Apple goes after Gizmodo (Jason Chen) for buying stolen property that they didn't claim in the first place?