beans

I didn't bother to read the article, but isn't it a jump to go from, "create a mac look and feel" to "copying mac look and feel"?


Might be semantics, but one is not like the other, not entirely.


and tuaw, cut it with the bullshit full page ads. The more I see them the less I'm coming here, they're annoying.

HIS EFFING FACE SUCKS!!!!

that sucks and by that I mean that that annoying little bitch and that big manly dude, adam sessler and morgan webb, respectively, are going to cover it.

clooney for snake, yeah right...hayter, he's got the voice but he's no snake and russell is too old and fat. There's only two people that have the look, one more so than the other, and that's eric bana and tom cruise. I'm leaning towards eric bana

two words: band hero. Kinda farfetched but with the ps3 allowing a lot of controllers per console, band hero would be awesome.

the psp would be perfect with one simple redesign. For those with a psp try this out and tell me how it feels: hold your psp upside down, meaning hold it like you normally would only with the d pad and nub being in your right hand. Now imagine another nub on the opposite side to the one it already has, and the d pad and all the other buttons in their original places. That's the way it should have been designed in the first place, would be easier to play a lot of games with this layout and it wouldn't cramp your thumbs. booyah

#8, in response to "Devices that does one thing always does a better job than a device that does many things, look at the ipod" typos, misspellings, and grammar aside, that's not always the case. Look at the GameCube. Personally, I love that system, but honestly, did it do well compared to its competitors? And an iPod isn't a great device solely because it's only an mp3 player. It's doing so well because it is (or was) an innovative player with a great design and user friendly controls that ultimately became a status symbol. As far a Sony forcing us to buy things, are you serious? #2, Piddy, "(Nintendo's) attention to customers has never faltered - which is more than I can (say)so for Sony. I often get the feeling Sony just doesn't give a sh@t about what people think/want, they just go ahead and do whatever they think will garner them more market share". You're contradicting yourself and you don't even know it. I admire Nintendo for adhering to their claim that their number one priority is entertaining people with their games. I love them for that. However, with consoles today and consumer's wants, the table stakes for a console require that emphasis does not solely lie on the how much entertainment the system can provide through it's games. A console has to be a complete entertainment system, providing more than the latest graphics and traditional mascots. Sony understands that; most successful businesses understand that. Believe it or not, Sony listens to its customers. They're the reason that you can play dvd movies with most consoles now. You can't please everyone, so Sony tries to please as many people as possible. It's impossible for Sony to "garner more market share, media/format supremacy or cash" if Sony didn't care about its customers because if Sony doesn't please them, Sony fails. It's funny that you said that though, that they do whatever they want, and then you end your post with "Despite that, I'm still looking forward to the PS3". Quite funny...